Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects

被引:12
|
作者
Tao, R
Lankheet, MJM
van de Grind, WA
van Wezel, RJA
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Funct Neurobiol, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Sch, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Baogang Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Baotou, Innger Mongolia, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p3442
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
It is well established that motion aftereffects (MAEs) can show interocular transfer (IOT); that is, motion adaptation in one eye can give a MAE in the other eye. Different quantification methods and different test stimuli have been shown to give different IOT magnitudes, varying from no to almost full IOT. In this study, we examine to what extent IOT of the dynamic MAE (dMAE), that is the MAE seen with a dynamic noise test pattern, varies with velocity of the adaptation stimulus. We measured strength of dMAE by a nulling method. The aftereffect induced by adaptation to a moving random-pixel array was compensated (nulled), during a brief dynamic test period, by the same kind of motion stimulus of variable luminance signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR). The LSNR nulling value was determined in a Quest-staircase procedure. We found that velocity has a strong effect on the magnitude of IOT for the dMAE. For increasing speeds from 1.5 deg s(-1) to 24 deg s(-1) average IOT values increased about linearly from 18% to 63% or from 32% to 83%, depending on IOT definition. The finding that dMAEs transfer to an increasing extent as speed increases, suggests that binocular cells play a more dominant role at higher speeds.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 866
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interocular transfer of a rotational motion aftereffect as a function of eccentricity
    Grove, Philip M.
    Ashida, Hiroshi
    Kaneko, Hirohiko
    Ono, Hiroshi
    PERCEPTION, 2008, 37 (08) : 1152 - 1159
  • [32] The aftereffect to relative motion does not show interocular transfer
    Symons, LA
    Pearson, PM
    Timney, B
    PERCEPTION, 1996, 25 (06) : 651 - 660
  • [33] INTEROCULAR TRANSFER OF MOTION AFTEREFFECT IN NORMAL AND STEREOBLIND OBSERVERS
    MITCHELL, DE
    REARDON, J
    MUIR, DW
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1975, 22 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [34] APPARENT VELOCITY OF MOTION AFTEREFFECTS IN CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL-VISION
    WRIGHT, MJ
    PERCEPTION, 1986, 15 (05) : 603 - 612
  • [36] Relative motion aftereffects caused by adaptation to random dynamic and motion noise
    Hine, TJ
    Renneflott, A
    Chappell, M
    PERCEPTION, 2002, 31 : 130 - 130
  • [37] Motion in depth cued by chromatic interocular velocity differences and changing disparity
    Wade, A.
    Jordan, J.
    Kaestner, M.
    Shah, P.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 13 - 14
  • [38] Interocular transfer does not imply binocular sum of motion aftereffect
    Grunewald, A.
    Mingolla, E.
    PERCEPTION, 1998, 27 : 189 - 190
  • [39] PERFECT INTEROCULAR TRANSFER OF FLICKER MOTION AFTER-EFFECT
    NISHIDA, S
    ASHIDA, H
    SATO, T
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 2157 - 2157
  • [40] Integration of monocular motion signals and the analysis of interocular velocity differences for the perception of motion-in-depth
    Shioiri, Satoshi
    Kakehi, Daisuke
    Tashiro, Tomoyoshi
    Yaguchi, Hirohisa
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (13):