Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects

被引:12
|
作者
Tao, R
Lankheet, MJM
van de Grind, WA
van Wezel, RJA
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Funct Neurobiol, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Sch, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Baogang Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Baotou, Innger Mongolia, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p3442
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
It is well established that motion aftereffects (MAEs) can show interocular transfer (IOT); that is, motion adaptation in one eye can give a MAE in the other eye. Different quantification methods and different test stimuli have been shown to give different IOT magnitudes, varying from no to almost full IOT. In this study, we examine to what extent IOT of the dynamic MAE (dMAE), that is the MAE seen with a dynamic noise test pattern, varies with velocity of the adaptation stimulus. We measured strength of dMAE by a nulling method. The aftereffect induced by adaptation to a moving random-pixel array was compensated (nulled), during a brief dynamic test period, by the same kind of motion stimulus of variable luminance signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR). The LSNR nulling value was determined in a Quest-staircase procedure. We found that velocity has a strong effect on the magnitude of IOT for the dMAE. For increasing speeds from 1.5 deg s(-1) to 24 deg s(-1) average IOT values increased about linearly from 18% to 63% or from 32% to 83%, depending on IOT definition. The finding that dMAEs transfer to an increasing extent as speed increases, suggests that binocular cells play a more dominant role at higher speeds.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 866
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LINES AND GRATINGS - DIFFERENT INTEROCULAR AFTEREFFECTS
    FIORENTINI, A
    SIRETEANU, R
    SPINELLI, D
    VISION RESEARCH, 1976, 16 (11) : 1303 - 1309
  • [22] Unbiased measures of interocular transfer of motion adaptation
    Vilidaite, Greta
    Baker, Daniel H.
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 (05) : 541 - 555
  • [23] Interocular transfer of adaptation for five types of motion
    Vilidaite, G.
    Baker, D. H.
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 (04) : 468 - 468
  • [24] VISUAL TEXTURE AS A FACTOR IN APPARENT VELOCITY OF OBJECTIVE MOTION AND MOTION AFTEREFFECTS
    WALKER, JT
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1975, 18 (02): : 175 - 180
  • [25] Motion Aftereffects Transfer between Touch and Vision
    Konkle, Talia
    Wang, Qi
    Hayward, Vincent
    Moore, Christopher I.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (09) : 745 - 750
  • [26] Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect
    Fernandez, JM
    Farell, B
    VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (8-9) : 1307 - 1317
  • [27] Cross-fixation transfer of motion aftereffects with expansion motion
    Meng, Xin
    Mazzoni, Pietro
    Qian, Ning
    VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (21) : 3681 - 3689
  • [28] INTEROCULAR GENERALIZATION OF ORIENTATION SPECIFIC COLOR AFTEREFFECTS
    MIKAELIAN, HH
    VISION RESEARCH, 1975, 15 (06) : 661 - 663
  • [29] COMPLETE INTEROCULAR TRANSFER OF MOTION ADAPTATION EFFECTS ON MOTION COHERENCE THRESHOLDS
    RAYMOND, JE
    VISION RESEARCH, 1993, 33 (13) : 1865 - 1870
  • [30] COMPLETE INTEROCULAR TRANSFER OF MOTION AFTEREFFECT WITH FLICKERING TEST
    NISHIDA, S
    ASHIDA, H
    SATO, T
    VISION RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (20) : 2707 - 2716