The positive role of trade openness in industrial green total factor productivity-provincial evidence from China

被引:43
作者
Ding, Lili [1 ]
Wu, Mingliang [2 ]
Jiao, Zheng [2 ]
Nie, Yongyou [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
关键词
Green total factor productivity; Trade openness; Dynamic panel model; Super-SBM model; Malmquist-Luenberger index; China; CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; EFFICIENCY; REGULATIONS; CONSUMPTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-16164-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The sustainable development of the economy is a key issue of global concern. Green total factor productivity (GTFP) combining economic growth with resources and the environment can evaluate the quality of economic development comprehensively and accurately. In this paper, super slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model and Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) index were used to calculate GTFP. The trend of industrial GTFP in China's 30 provinces from 2006-2015 was analyzed. Furtherly, a dynamic panel model was used to discuss the impact of trade openness on GTFP. The results showed that (1) the growth rate of GTFP rose from 2007 to 2011 and declined significantly from 2011 to 2015, and GTFP only achieved positive growth in 2011; (2) the growth rate of GTFP in the eastern region was higher than that in the central and western regions; (3) the trend of technical progress change (MLTECH) index was highly consistent with that of ML index. That was, technical progress played a major role in the variation of GTFP; (4) trade openness could significantly improve China's GTFP. Every 1% increase in trade openness could increase GTFP by 0.097% on average. It is advisable to implement differentiated economic development and environmental policies in different regions. Meanwhile, relevant measures can be taken to promote import and export trade, such as encouraging companies to increase investment in green technology research and development, optimizing the trade environment.
引用
收藏
页码:6538 / 6551
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Afzal M., 2010, J QUANT ECON, V8, P130
[2]   Green TFP Intensity Impact on Sustainable East Asian Productivity Growth [J].
Ahmed, Elsadig M. .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2012, 42 (01) :67-78
[3]   The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe [J].
Al-Mulali, Usama ;
Ozturk, Ilhan ;
Lean, Hooi Hooi .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (01) :621-644
[4]   The environmental consequences of globalization: A country-specific time-series analysis [J].
Baek, Jungho ;
Cho, Yongsung ;
Koo, Won W. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (8-9) :2255-2264
[5]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]   Green Total Factor Productivity Growth and Its Determinants in China's Industrial Economy [J].
Chen, Chaofan ;
Lan, Qingxin ;
Gao, Ming ;
Sun, Yawen .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
[8]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[9]   Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries [J].
Destek, Mehmet Akif ;
Sinha, Avik .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 242
[10]   Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity [J].
Du, Kerui ;
Li, Jianglong .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 131 :240-250