Assessing quality of life in stuttering treatment outcomes research

被引:113
|
作者
Yaruss, J. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Stuttering; Quality of life; OASES; Treatment outcomes; Treatment efficacy; International Classification of Functioning; Disability; Health; SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN; COMMUNICATION ATTITUDE; STEREOTYPE FORMATION; ENHANCING TREATMENT; SPEECH TREATMENT; PRESCHOOL; PEOPLE; ADULTS; IMPACT; NONSTUTTERERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.010
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Stuttering can affect many aspects of a person's life. People who stutter report that they experience negative reactions to stuttering, difficulty communicating in key situations, diminished satisfaction with life, and a reduced ability to achieve their goals in life. Unfortunately, most treatment outcomes studies have focused on changes in the observable characteristics of stuttering, with significantly fewer studies examining the broader consequences of stuttering. This paper proposes that evaluation of stuttering treatment outcomes can be enhanced through assessment of impact of stuttering on a speaker's quality of life. A means of assessing quality of life is described, based on the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES; Yaruss & Quesal, 2006, 2008). The OASES is a multi-dimensional assessment instrument built upon the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF; WHO, 2001; see also Yaruss & Quesal, 2004). One section of the OASES is designed to assess specific aspects of quality of life in individuals who stutter. Preliminary data from two ongoing studies involving the OASES are briefly summarized in order to demonstrate: (a) that individuals who stutter do report an adverse impact on their quality of life as a result of stuttering and (b) that quality of life can improve following treatment for stuttering. It is recommended that future stuttering treatment outcomes studies directly examine the broader consequence of stuttering by focusing, in part, on quality of life. Educational objectives: After reading this article, the participant will be able to: (1) describe some of the adverse consequences of stuttering reported by individuals who stutter; (2) define quality of life as it relates to the study of the stuttering disorder; (3) explain the value of assessing quality of life in stuttering treatment outcomes research. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 202
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Major discrimination due to stuttering and its association with quality of life
    Boyle, Michael P.
    Cheyne, Madeline R.
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2024, 80
  • [2] Stuttering and work life: An interpretative phenomenological analysis
    Bricker-Katz, Geraldine
    Lincoln, Michelle
    Cumming, Steven
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2013, 38 (04) : 342 - 355
  • [3] Student clinicians' and clients' perceptions of the therapeutic alliance and outcomes in stuttering treatment
    Croft, Robyn L.
    Watson, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2019, 61
  • [4] The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adults who stutter
    Craig, Ashley
    Blumgart, Elaine
    Tran, Yvonne
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2009, 34 (02) : 61 - 71
  • [5] Assessing methodological quality of randomized and quasi-experimental trials: A summary of stuttering treatment research
    Nye, Chad
    Hahs-Vaughn, Debbie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2011, 13 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [6] Disclosure of stuttering and quality of life in people who stutter
    Boyle, Michael P.
    Milewski, Kathryn M.
    Beita-Ell, Carolina
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2018, 58 : 1 - 10
  • [7] Health-related quality of life based on KIDSCREEN-52 in stuttering children and adolescents
    Ozgur, Erdogan
    Ozgur, Borte Gurbuz
    ENT UPDATES, 2020, 10 (03): : 430 - 438
  • [8] Current state of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Reijneveld, Jaap C.
    Koller, Michael
    Flechtner, Henning
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    Greimel, Eva
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Ringash, Jolie
    Sasseville, Maxime
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Kluetz, Paul G.
    Campbell, Alicyn
    Tafuri, Giovanni
    Gronvold, Mogens
    Snyder, Claire
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Fallowfield, Dame Lesley
    Apostolidis, Kathi
    Wilson, Roger
    Stephens, Richard
    Oliver, Kathy
    Schunemann, Holger
    Calvert, Melanie
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Musoro, Jammbe Z.
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Pe, Madeline
    Coens, Corneel
    Velikova, Galina
    Kulis, Dagmara
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    Darlington, Anne-Sophie
    Lewis, Ian
    van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 121 : 55 - 63
  • [9] Assessing attentional biases with stuttering
    Lowe, Robyn
    Menzies, Ross
    Packman, Ann
    O'Brian, Sue
    Jones, Mark
    Onslow, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2016, 51 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [10] Assessing stuttering treatment without assessing stuttering? A response to Reitzes and Snyder (2006)
    Blomgren, Michael
    Roy, Nelson
    Callister, Thomas
    Merrill, Ray M.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (06): : 1423 - 1426