From evidence-based to hope-based medicine? Ethical aspects on conditional market authorization of and early access to new cancer drugs

被引:8
作者
Sandman, Lars [1 ,2 ]
Liliemark, Jan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Natl Ctr Prior Setting Hlth Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Boras, Acad Hlth Welf & Work Life, Boras, Sweden
[3] Swedish Agcy Hlth Technol Assessment & Assessment, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Dent & Pharmaceut Benefits Agcy, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Conditional market authorisation; Evidence; Ethics; Beneficence; Non-maleficence; Justice; Autonomy; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BREAST-CANCER; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; SURVIVAL; BENEFIT; EUROPE; NEED; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.05.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There is a strong patient demand for early access to potentially beneficial cancer drugs. In line with this authorization agencies like the European Medicines Agency are providing drugs with conditional market authorisation based on positive interim analyses. This implies that drugs are used with insecure evidence of efficacy and adverse side-effects. Several authors have pointed to ethical problems with such a system but up to date no indepth ethical analysis of this system is found which is the aim of this article. Drawing of the four generally accepted principles of medical ethics: beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy and justice the ethical pros and cons of conditional market authorisation are analysed. From the perspective of beneficence and non maleficence it is found that the main problem is not risk of adverse side-effects to patients, but rather risk of less beneficial outcomes than what can be expected which could change incentives for patients' choice of treatment. This is also related to the extent to which patients might make an autonomous choice, especially taking into account problematic psychological attitudes and biases in medical decision-making. However, the main problem is related to justice and an equitable distribution of scarce health-care resources given the opportunity cost of drugs treatment. When using resources on cancer treatments which later might be found to be less efficacious than was first expected, other patients (in and outside the cancer field) are deprived of potentially more beneficial treatments even though their needs might be equally or more severe. At the same time, demanding more evidence has an ethical cost to patients in terms of depriving them of potential benefits in terms of reduced mortality and morbidity. In order to handle these ethical conflicts further research and analyses are required and it is suggested that pricing strategies and information requirements are alternatives to be further explored.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 63
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   ASSESSING PATIENTS CAPACITIES TO CONSENT TO TREATMENT [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
GRISSO, T .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 319 (25) :1635-1638
[2]   Approvals of drugs with uncertain benefit-risk profiles in Europe [J].
Banzi, Rita ;
Gerardi, Chiara ;
Bertele, Vittorio ;
Garattini, Silvio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 26 (08) :572-584
[3]   Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: Is there a problem and if so, what is it? [J].
Bassler, Dirk ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Briel, Matthias ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Walter, Stephen D. ;
Ramsay, Tim ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (02) :159-168
[4]   Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis [J].
Bassler, Dirk ;
Briel, Matthias ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Lane, Melanie ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Heels-Ansdell, Diane ;
Walter, Stephen D. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (12) :1180-1187
[5]  
Beauchamp TL., 2019, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, V8th
[6]   Haematological anticancer drugs in Europe: any added value at the time of approval? [J].
Bertele, Vittorio ;
Banzi, Rita ;
Capasso, Filippo ;
Tafuri, Giovanni ;
Trotta, Francesco ;
Apolone, Giovanni ;
Garattini, Silvio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 63 (07) :713-719
[7]  
Brulde B, 2000, Med Health Care Philos, V3, P305
[8]   Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Women with HER-2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Survival Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial [J].
Cameron, David ;
Casey, Michelle ;
Oliva, Cristina ;
Newstat, Beth ;
Imwalle, Bradley ;
Geyer, Charles E. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 (09) :924-934
[9]   Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research - Some lessons from recent UK experience [J].
Claxton, Karl P. ;
Sculpher, Mark J. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (11) :1055-1068
[10]   The European Medicines Agency review of vemurafenib (Zelboraf®) for the treatment of adult patients with BRAF 600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Summary of the scientific assessment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use [J].
Dias, Silvy da Rocha ;
Salmonson, Tomas ;
van Zwieten-Boot, Barbara ;
Jonsson, Bertil ;
Marchetti, Serena ;
Schellens, Jan H. M. ;
Giuliani, Rosa ;
Pignatti, Francesco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (07) :1654-1661