A comprehensive theory of human mating must explain between-sex and within-sex differences in mating strategies

被引：9

作者：

Bleske, AL ^{[1
]}

Buss, DM ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Texas, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA

来源：

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES | 2000年 / 23卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S0140525X00293370

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Gangestad & Simpson make a major contribution by highlighting the importance of mate choice for good genes, the costs of alternative strategies, and tradeoffs inherent in human mating. By downplaying sex differences and ignoring the nongenetic adaptive benefits of short term mating, however, they undermine their goal of "strategic pluralism" by presenting a theory devoid of many documented complexities of human mating.

引用

页码：593 / +

页数：11