Further Defining the Role of the Laboratory Genetic Counselor

被引:32
作者
Waltman, Lindsey [1 ]
Runke, Cassandra [1 ]
Balcom, Jessica [1 ]
Riley, Jacquelyn D. [2 ]
Lilley, Margaret [3 ]
Christian, Susan [3 ]
Zetzsche, Lindsay [1 ]
Goodenberger, McKinsey L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, 9500 Euclid Ave LL2-2, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Alberta Hosp, 8440 112 St NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Laboratory; Genetic counselor; Non-clinical; Roles;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-015-9927-4
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Laboratory genetic counseling is becoming increasingly common as a result of increased laboratory services and genetic testing menus, as well as growing job responsibilities. Christian et al. (2012) provided the first quantitative data regarding the roles of the laboratory-based genetic counselor (LBGC) finding that two of the most prevalent roles are as customer liaisons and communicators of test results. The goal of the present study was to further delineate the role of the LBGC by addressing specific tasks that LBGCs are involved with on a day-to-day basis. A survey was designed to expand upon themes identified in the Christian et al. (2012) study by querying specific tasks performed in several categories of potential LBGC job duties. An invitation for LBGCs to participate was distributed via email to the membership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors (CAGC). We identified 121 genetic counselors who primarily work in the laboratory setting or whose job role includes a laboratory component. Almost all respondents performed customer liaison/case coordination (95 %), and interpretation and result reporting (88 %). The most frequently performed tasks within these categories involved addressing questions from clients, making phone calls with genetic testing results, obtaining clinical or family history information for results interpretation, and composing case-specific interpretations for unique results and/or obtaining literature references to support interpretations. The study results also point to trends of expanding roles in sales and marketing, variant interpretation and management responsibilities. Results of this study may be useful to further define the full scope of practice of LBGCs, aid in the development of new LBGC positions and expand current positions to include roles related to test development, research, and student supervision. It may also aid in curriculum updates for training programs to increase exposure to LBGC roles.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 798
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling, 2013, STAND ACCR GRAD PROG
[2]  
Amos J, 1998, HUM MUTAT, V12, P293, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)12:5<293::AID-HUMU1>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]   Defining the Role of Laboratory Genetic Counselor [J].
Christian, Susan ;
Lilley, Margaret ;
Hume, Stacey ;
Scott, Patrick ;
Somerville, Martin .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (04) :605-611
[5]  
College of American Pathologists (CAP), 2014, ISS SCOP PRACT GEN C
[6]  
Dickerson J., 2015, AM COLL MED GEN ANN
[7]   Improving the Value of Costly Genetic Reference Laboratory Testing With Active Utilization Management [J].
Dickerson, Jane A. ;
Cole, Bonnie ;
Conta, Jessie H. ;
Wellner, Monica ;
Wallace, Stephanie E. ;
Jack, Rhona M. ;
Rutledge, Joe ;
Astion, Michael L. .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 138 (01) :110-113
[8]   Genetic testing utilization and the role of the laboratory genetic counselor [J].
Kotzer, Katrina E. ;
Riley, Jacquelyn D. ;
Conta, Jessie H. ;
Anderson, Claire M. ;
Schahl, Kimberly A. ;
Goodenberger, McKinsey L. .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2014, 427 :193-195
[9]   Genetic Counselor Review of Genetic Test Orders in a Reference Laboratory Reduces Unnecessary Testing [J].
Miller, Christine E. ;
Krautscheid, Patti ;
Baldwin, Erin E. ;
Tvrdik, Tatiana ;
Openshaw, Amanda S. ;
Hart, Kim ;
LaGrave, Danielle .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2014, 164 (05) :1094-1101
[10]  
National Society of Genetic Counselors, 2014, PROF STAT SURV