Validation of the German version of the "assessment of DSM-IV personality disorders (ADP-IV)" questionnaire

被引:59
作者
Doering, Stephan
Renn, Daniela
Hofer, Stefan
Rumpold, Gerhard
Smrekar, Ulrike
Janecke, Nicola
Schatz, Dieter S.
Schotte, Chris
DeDoncker, Dirk
Schussler, Gerhard
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Poliklin Zahnarztl Prothet, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Antwerp, Dept Psychiat, Antwerp, Belgium
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE | 2007年 / 53卷 / 02期
关键词
personality disorders; diagnosis; questionnaire; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.13109/zptm.2007.53.2.111
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: The,,Assessment of DSM-IV Personality Disorders (ADP-IV)" is a 94-item questionnaire that allows for a categorical and dimensional assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Methods: Psychometric properties of the German ADP-IV were investigated in 400 psychotherapy outpatients and a community sample of 385 persons. The SCID-II interview and a standardised expert consensus rating were employed for the assessment of concurrent validity. Results: The ADP-IV showed satisfactory reliability. The median Cronbachs a for the subscales was 0.76 (range 0.65 - 0.87) and the median retest reliability 0.79 (range 0.37 - 0.88). Factor analysis revealed an 11 -factor solution that explained 49.4 % of the variance. The median correlation of the dimensional ADP-IV subscale scores with the SCID-11 and the expert consensus ratings were 0.51 (range: 0.34 - 0.72) and 0.44 (range: 0.27 - 0.62), respectively. The kappas for the chance-corrected agreement of categorical ADP-IV diagnoses with the SCID-11 diagnoses and the expert ratings were 0.35 and 0.29 for any personality disorder and a median of 0.37 and 0.30 for the specific personality disorders. Conclusions: The ADP-IV shows satisfactory reliability and a validity that is comparable and in part even superior to other self-rating instruments. The advantages of the instrument are its brevity, the inclusion of distress ratings, and the dimensional scoring that allows for the construction of detailed profiles of personality pathology. Moreover, it is conveniently available as a free internet download.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 128
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DSM 4 PERSONALITY DI
[2]   VALIDATION OF THE WISCONSIN PERSONALITY-DISORDERS INVENTORY WITH THE SCID-II AND PDE [J].
BARBER, JP ;
MORSE, JQ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1994, 8 (04) :307-319
[3]  
Benjamin L. S., 1993, INTERPERSONAL DIAGNO
[4]   COMPARISON OF A SELF-RATING QUESTIONNAIRE WITH A DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF DSM-III-R PERSONALITY-DISORDERS [J].
BRONISCH, T ;
FLETT, S ;
GARCIABORREGUERO, D ;
WOLF, R .
PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 1993, 26 (02) :102-107
[5]  
DILLING H, 2004, KLIN DIAGNOSTISCHE L, V5
[6]  
Fleiss Joseph L., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, V2
[7]  
FYDRICH T, 1997, STRUKTURIERTES KLINS, V2
[8]   Operationalized psychodynamic diagnostic (OPD) - Potential for quality assurance [J].
Heuft, VG ;
Jakobsen, T ;
Kriebel, R ;
Schneider, W ;
Rudolf, G .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2005, 51 (03) :261-276
[9]  
Hyler S.E., 1987, PDQ R PERSONALITY DI
[10]  
Hyler S.E., 1988, Journal of Personality Disorders, V2, P229, DOI [10.1521/pedi.1988.2.3.229, DOI 10.1521/PEDI.1988.2.3.229]