What Is the Main Difference between Medium-Depth Geothermal Heat Pump Systems and Conventional Shallow-Depth Geothermal Heat Pump Systems? Field Tests and Comparative Study

被引:16
作者
Deng, Jiewen [1 ]
Wei, Qingpeng [1 ]
He, Shi [1 ]
Liang, Mei [1 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Bldg Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 23期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
medium-depth geothermal heat pump system; shallow-depth geothermal heat pump system; field test; comparative study; energy performance; THERMAL IMBALANCE; COLD CLIMATE; PERFORMANCE; FEASIBILITY; EXCHANGERS;
D O I
10.3390/app9235120
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Recently, the medium-depth geothermal heat pump systems (MD-GHPs) have been applied for space heating in China. Theoretically, the MD-GHPs use deep borehole heat exchangers (DBHEs) to extract heat from the medium-depth geothermal energy with the depth of 2 similar to 3 km, thus, improving the energy performance of whole systems obviously. This paper conducts field tests of nine conventional shallow-depth geothermal heat pump systems (SD-GHPs) and eight MD-GHPs to analyze the energy performance of heat pump systems, as well as heat transfer performance of ground heat exchangers. Then the comparative studies are carried out to analyze the difference between these two ground coupled heat pump systems. Field test results show that the outlet water temperature of DBHEs in MD-GHP can reach more than 30 degrees C with heat extraction of 195.2 kW similar to 302.8 kW per DBHE with a depth of 2500 m, which are much higher than that of SD-GHPs. However, the heat pumps and water pumps in the ground side should be specially designed to fit the high-temperature heat source instead of following operation mode of SD-GHPs. Then with variable speed compressor which has high energy efficiency under a wide range of load rate and compressor ratio, and with the ground-side water pumps which efficiently operate under high water resistance and low flow rate, the COP of heat pumps and COPS of whole systems could reach 7.80 and 6.46 separately. Thus, the advantage of high-temperature heat source could be fully utilized to achieve great energy-saving effects.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bujok P., 2012, INT J GEOPHYS, V29, P97, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/916541
[2]   Experimental and numerical investigation of heat transfer performance and sustainability of deep borehole heat exchangers coupled with ground source heat pump systems [J].
Cai, Wanlong ;
Wang, Fenghao ;
Liu, Jun ;
Wang, Zhihua ;
Ma, Zhenjun .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 149 :975-986
[3]   Field test on energy performance of medium-depth geothermal heat pump systems (MD-GHPs) [J].
Deng, Jiewen ;
Wei, Qingpeng ;
Liang, Mei ;
He, Shi ;
Zhang, Hui .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 184 :289-299
[4]   Does heat pumps perform energy efficiently as we expected: Field tests and evaluations on various kinds of heat pump systems for space heating [J].
Deng, Jiewen ;
Wei, Qingpeng ;
Liang, Mei ;
He, Shi ;
Zhang, Hui .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 182 :172-186
[5]   Technoeconomic appraisal of a ground source heat pump system for a heating season in eastern Turkey [J].
Esen, H ;
Inalli, M ;
Esen, M .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (9-10) :1281-1297
[6]   A computationally efficient numerical model for heat transfer simulation of deep borehole heat exchangers [J].
Fang, Liang ;
Diao, Nairen ;
Shao, Zhukun ;
Zhu, Ke ;
Fang, Zhaohong .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 167 :79-88
[7]  
Feng YM, 2012, ASHRAE TRAN, V118, P301
[8]  
Jiang Y., 2005, J. HVAC, V5, P30
[9]   System performance of a deep borehole heat exchanger [J].
Kohl, T ;
Brenni, R ;
Eugster, W .
GEOTHERMICS, 2002, 31 (06) :687-708
[10]   Study on reasonable selection of insulation depth of the outlet section of vertical deep-buried U-bend tube heat exchanger [J].
Li, Chao ;
Guan, Yanling ;
Wang, Xing .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 167 :231-239