On the Ontological Quality and Logical Quality of Conceptual-Modeling Grammars: The Need for a Dual Perspective

被引:17
作者
Clarke, Roger [1 ]
Burton-Jones, Andrew [2 ]
Weber, Ron [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Polit Int Studies & Philosophy, Belfast BT7 1PB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
conceptual modeling; semantics; ontology; logic; DATABASE DESIGN; DEFICIENCIES; KNOWLEDGE; SEMANTICS; LANGUAGES;
D O I
10.1287/isre.2016.0631
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
A core activity in information systems development involves building a conceptual model of the domain that an information system is intended to support. Such models are created using a conceptual-modeling (CM) grammar. Just as high-quality conceptual models facilitate high-quality systems development, high-quality CM grammars facilitate high-quality CM. This paper provides a new perspective on ways to improve the quality of the semantics of CM grammars. For many years, the leading approach to this topic has relied on ontological theory. We show, however, that the ontological approach captures only half the story; it needs to be coupled with a logical approach. We explain how the ontological and logical qualities of CM grammars interrelate. Furthermore, we outline three contributions of a logical approach to evaluating the quality of CM grammars: a means of seeing some familiar CM problems in simpler ways, illumination of new problems, and proving the benefit of modifying existing CM grammars in particular ways. We demonstrate these benefits in the context of the Entity-Relationship grammar. More generally, our paper opens a new area of research with many opportunities for future research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 382
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[41]  
Ludwig K, 2007, THEORY DECIS LIB A, V41, P49, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6104-2_2
[42]   The "Physics" of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering [J].
Moody, Daniel L. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2009, 35 (06) :756-779
[43]  
MORTIMER M, 1975, Z MATH LOGIK, V21, P135, DOI 10.1002/malq.19750210118
[44]   TELOS - REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE ABOUT INFORMATION-SYSTEMS [J].
MYLOPOULOS, J ;
BORGIDA, A ;
JARKE, M ;
KOUBARAKIS, M .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1990, 8 (04) :325-362
[45]  
Opdahl A. L., 2002, Software and Systems Modeling, V1, P43
[46]  
Patel - Schneider P.F., 2012, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: New features and rationale, VSecond
[47]   Stopping behavior of systems analysts during information requirements elicitation [J].
Pitts, MG ;
Browne, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2004, 21 (01) :203-226
[48]   A comprehensive framework for modeling set-based business rules during conceptual database design [J].
Ram, S ;
Khatri, V .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 30 (02) :89-118
[49]  
Recker J, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P57
[50]   The ontological deficiencies of process modeling in practice [J].
Recker, Jan ;
Indulska, Marta ;
Rosemann, Michael ;
Green, Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 19 (05) :501-525