Video or In-Clinic Consultation? Selection of Attributes as Preparation for a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Key Stakeholders

被引:17
作者
Chudner, Irit [1 ]
Goldfracht, Margalit [1 ]
Goldblatt, Hadass [2 ]
Drach-Zahavy, Anat [2 ]
Karkabi, Khaled [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, Family Med Dept, Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Fac Social Welf & Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Haifa, Israel
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; TELEMEDICINE; PREFERENCES; MODEL; TELEHEALTH; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; IMPROVE; USERS;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-018-0318-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionVideo consultations (VCs) provide increased accessibility of primary care to remote areas and overall improved care for chronic patients. They also contribute to higher patient satisfaction and improved resource management. Despite these benefits, VC integration into the health system is complex and slow. Understanding the VC-related preferences of three key stakeholderspatients, primary care physicians(PCPs) and policy makers (PMs)is crucial for achieving optimal implementation.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to select relevant attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment (DCE) of stakeholders' choiceVC or traditional in-clinic consultation (I-CC) in primary care.MethodsTen semi-structured focus group interviews and 24 semi-structured individual interviews were conducted. Data analysis was performed inductively, using a thematic content analysis method. An attribute-ranking exercise was then conducted based on the results gleaned from the interviews.ResultsThe most important attributes when choosing either VC or I-CC, for both patients and PMs, were: (1) time to next available appointment; (2) time in line before consultation; (3) relationship to PCP; and (4) quality of consultation. For PCPs, the most important attributes were: (1) time in line before consultation; (2) patient's self-management ability; (3) consultation purpose; (4) quality of consultation.ConclusionsThis qualitative study identified attributes and levels for a DCE quantitative stage among three key stakeholder groups. It adds to the literature of examples of developing DCE attributes, and to literature about the stakeholder benefits in the area of telemedicine in healthcare.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Specialist physicians' knowledge and beliefs about telemedicine: A comparison of users and nonusers of the technology [J].
Barton, Phoebe Lindsey ;
Brega, Angela G. ;
Devore, Patricia A. ;
Mueller, Keith ;
Paulich, Marsha J. ;
Floersch, Natasha R. ;
Goodrich, Glenn K. ;
Talkington, Sylvia G. ;
Bontrager, Jeff ;
Grigsby, Bill ;
Hrincevich, Carol ;
Neal, Susannah ;
Loker, Jeff L. ;
Araya, Tesfa M. ;
Bennett, Rachael E. ;
Krohn, Neil ;
Grigsby, Jim .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2007, 13 (05) :487-499
[2]   How patients perceive the therapeutic communications skills of their general practitioners, and how that perception affects adherence: use of the TCom-skill GP scale in a specific geographical area [J].
Baumann, Michele ;
Baumann, Cedric ;
Le Bihan, Etienne ;
Chau, Nearkasen .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (1)
[3]  
Blakeman T, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P407
[4]  
Booth Nick, 2004, Inform Prim Care, V12, P75
[5]   What patients want from primary care consultations: A discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities [J].
Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh ;
Hole, Arne Risa ;
Mead, Nicola ;
McDonald, Ruth ;
Whalley, Diane ;
Bower, Peter ;
Roland, Martin .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (02) :107-115
[6]   Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature [J].
Clark, Michael D. ;
Determann, Domino ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Moro, Domenico ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) :883-902
[7]   Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations [J].
Coast, Joanna ;
Al-Janabi, Hareth ;
Sutton, Eileen J. ;
Horrocks, Susan A. ;
Vosper, A. Jane ;
Swancutt, Dawn R. ;
Flynn, Terry N. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (06) :730-741
[8]  
Corbin J.M., 2008, Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Vthird, DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
[9]  
Currie Wendy L., 2014, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, V26, P3
[10]   Understanding stakeholder power and influence gaps in a health care organization: An empirical study [J].
Daake, D ;
Anthony, WP .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 25 (03) :94-107