A comparative study of the response of the roots and shoots of sunflower and maize to mechanical stimulation

被引:75
作者
Goodman, AM
Ennos, AR
机构
[1] School of Biological Sciences, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, Oxford Road
关键词
thigmomorphogenesis; Helianthus annuus L; Zea mays; anchorage; lodging;
D O I
10.1093/jxb/47.10.1499
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Despite numerous studies of the effects of mechanical stimulation on plant shoots, the response of roots to mechanical stimulation has largely been neglected. In this study the effects of shoot flexure on the morphology and mechanics of two contrasting species of herbaceous angiosperm, growing in a glasshouse were compared: maize (Zea mays), a monocot; and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) a dicot. Mechanical stimulation affected the root more than the shoot components. Root systems of mechanically-stressed sunflowers had a greater angle of spread and increased root number. As well as large morphological and weight effects, with increases over the control of 33% in the length of rigid root and 38% in the dry weight of lateral roots, in sunflowers, there were also mechanical effects. In both species roots of flexed plants were more rigid, stronger and composed of stiffer material and their root systems also provided greater anchorage strength. In contrast, there was only a small reduction in shoot weight and shoot height in flexed plants and no effects on mechanical properties. There were differences in behaviour between species; maize root morphology responded less than that of sunflowers to mechanical stimulation. The basal diameter of roots increased by only 8% compared with 16% in sunflowers, though the roots of both species showed similar increases in material stiffness. This difference is related to the lack of secondary thickening in the monocots compared with the dicot sunflowers.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1507
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF MECHANICALLY INDUCED STRESS ON THE GROWTH OF CAULIFLOWER, LETTUCE AND CELERY SEEDLINGS [J].
BIDDINGTON, NL ;
DEARMAN, AS .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1985, 55 (01) :109-119
[2]   THE MINERAL-NUTRITION OF WILD PLANTS [J].
CHAPIN, FS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1980, 11 :233-260
[3]   Mechanical differences between free-standing and supported wheat plants, Triticum aestivum L [J].
Crook, MJ ;
Ennos, AR .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1996, 77 (03) :197-202
[4]   COMPARATIVE FUNCTIONAL-MORPHOLOGY OF THE ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS OF ANNUAL DICOTS [J].
ENNOS, AR ;
FITTER, AH .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 6 (01) :71-78
[5]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS OF HIMALAYAN BALSAM IMPATIENS-GLANDULIFERA AND MATURE SUNFLOWER HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS [J].
ENNOS, AR ;
CROOK, MJ ;
GRIMSHAW, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1993, 44 (258) :133-146
[6]   THE ANCHORAGE MECHANICS OF MAIZE, ZEA-MAYS [J].
ENNOS, AR ;
CROOK, MJ ;
GRIMSHAW, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1993, 44 (258) :147-153
[7]   THE FUNCTION AND FORMATION OF BUTTRESSES [J].
ENNOS, AR .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1993, 8 (10) :350-351
[8]   ROOT BIOMECHANICS AND WHOLE-PLANT ALLOCATION PATTERNS - RESPONSES OF TOMATO PLANTS TO STEM FLEXURE [J].
GARTNER, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1994, 45 (280) :1647-1654
[9]  
GORDON JE, 1978, STRUCTURES WHY THING, P55
[10]   NUTRIENT-LIMITED GROWTH-RATES - QUANTITATIVE BENEFITS OF STRESS RESPONSES AND SOME ASPECTS OF REGULATION [J].
GUTSCHICK, VP ;
KAY, LE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1995, 46 (289) :995-1009