Efficacy of Secretagogues in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

被引:121
作者
Black, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Burr, Nicholas E. [1 ,2 ]
Quigley, Eamonn M. M. [3 ,4 ]
Moayyedi, Paul [5 ]
Houghton, Lesley A. [2 ]
Ford, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Gastroenterol Inst, Room 125,4th Floor,Bexley Wing,Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Biomed & Clin Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Lynda K & David M Underwood Ctr Digest Disorders, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Houston, TX USA
[5] McMaster Univ, Gastroenterol Div, Hlth Sci Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement; Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison; Effectiveness; Treatment Response; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; EVALUATE EFFICACY; ABDOMINAL-PAIN; HEALTH-CARE; LINACLOTIDE; LUBIPROSTONE; SAFETY; ANTIDEPRESSANTS;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several secretagogues have been approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). However, their relative efficacy is unclear because there have been no head-to-head randomized controlled trials. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare their efficacies in patients with IBS-C. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through June 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of secretagogues in adults with IBS-C. Trials included in the analysis reported a dichotomous assessment of overall response to therapy, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Efficacy and safety of secretagogues were reported as a pooled relative risk with 95% confidence interval to summarize the effect of each comparison tested, and treatments were ranked according to their P score. RESULTS: We identified 15 eligible randomized controlled trials of secretagogues that included 8462 patients. Linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, and tenapanor were superior to placebo for the treatment of IBS-C. Linaclotide (290 mu g once daily) was ranked first in efficacy based on the end point recommended by the Food and Drug Administration for trials in IBS-C, the primary end point used in each trial, abdominal pain, and complete spontaneous bowel movements. Tenapanor (50 mg twice daily) was ranked first for decreasing bloating. Total numbers of adverse events were significantly larger with linaclotide (290 and 500 mu g once daily) and plecanatide (3 mg once daily) compared with placebo. However, plecanatide 6 mg once daily ranked first for safety. Diarrhea was significantly more common with all drugs, except lubiprostone (8 mu g twice daily). Nausea was significantly more common in patients who received lubiprostone. CONCLUSIONS: In a network analysis of randomized controlled trials of secretagogues for IBS-C, we found all drugs to be superior to placebo. Efficacy was similar among individual drugs and dosages for most end points. However, data were extracted at the 12-week time point, so the long-term relative efficacy of these drugs is unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1763
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Geddes, John R.
    Salanti, Georgia
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 159 (02) : 130 - W54
  • [12] Clinical trial: lubiprostone in patients with constipation-associated irritable bowel syndrome - results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies
    Drossman, D. A.
    Chey, W. D.
    Johanson, J. F.
    Fass, R.
    Scott, C.
    Panas, R.
    Ueno, R.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 29 (03) : 329 - 341
  • [13] Cost-effectiveness of linaclotide compared to antidepressants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in Scotland
    Fisher, Mark
    Walker, Andrew
    Falques, Meritxell
    Moya, Miguel
    Rance, Mark
    Taylor, Douglas
    Lindner, Leandro
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 17 (09) : 1091 - 1100
  • [14] Meta-analysis: factors affecting placebo response rate in the irritable bowel syndrome
    Ford, A. C.
    Moayyedi, P.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (02) : 144 - 158
  • [15] Irritable bowel syndrome: A 10-yr natural history of symptoms and factors that influence consultation behavior
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Forman, David
    Bailey, Alastair G.
    Axon, Anthony T. R.
    Moayyedi, Paul
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (05) : 1229 - 1239
  • [16] Effect of Antidepressants and Psychological Therapies, Including Hypnotherapy, in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Quigley, Eamonn M. M.
    Lacy, Brian E.
    Lembo, Anthony J.
    Saito, Yuri A.
    Schiller, Lawrence R.
    Soffer, Edy E.
    Spiegel, Brennan M. R.
    Moayyedi, Paul
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (09) : 1350 - 1365
  • [17] Determining an optimal dose of linaclotide for use in Japanese patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Fukudo, S.
    Nakajima, A.
    Fujiyama, Y.
    Kosako, M.
    Nakagawa, A.
    Akiho, H.
    Nakashima, Y.
    Johnston, J. M.
    Miwa, H.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2018, 30 (05)
  • [18] Comment on Meta Analysis by Shah et al.
    Griffin, Patrick H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (09) : 1395 - 1395
  • [19] Higgins J., 2009, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2
  • [20] Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
    Higgins, J. P. T.
    Jackson, D.
    Barrett, J. K.
    Lu, G.
    Ades, A. E.
    White, I. R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2012, 3 (02) : 98 - 110