The evolutionary origins of electric signal complexity

被引:39
作者
Stoddard, PK [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
electric fish; evolution; communication; gymnotiformes;
D O I
10.1016/S0928-4257(03)00004-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study explores the evolutionary origins of waveform complexity in electric organ discharges (EODs) of weakly electric fish. I attempt to answer the basic question of what selective forces led to the transition from the simplest signal to the second simplest signal in the gymnotiform electric fishes. The simplest electric signal is a monophasic pulse and the second simplest is a biphasic pulse. I consider five adaptive hypotheses for the evolutionary transition from a monophasic to a biphasic EOD: (i) electrolocation, (ii) sexual selection, (iii) species isolation, (iv) territory defense, (v) crypsis from electroreceptive predators. Evaluating these hypotheses with data drawn largely from the literature, I find best support for predation. Predation is typically viewed as a restraining force on evolution of communication signals, but among the electric fishes, predation appears to have served as a creative catalyst. In suppressing spectral energy in the sensitivity range of predators (a spectral simplification), the EOD waveforms have become more complex in their time domain structure. Complexity in the time domain is readily discernable by the high frequency electroreceptor systems of gymnotiform and mormyrid electric fish. The addition of phases to the EOD can cloak the EOD from predators, but also provides a substrate for subsequent modification by sexual selection. But, while juveniles and females remain protected from predators, breeding males modify their EODs in ways that enhance their conspicuousness to predators. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 491
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Albert J.S, 2001, SPECIES DIVERSITY PH
[2]   Molecular insights into the phylogeny of Mormyriform fishes and the evolution of their electric organs [J].
AlvesGomes, J ;
Hopkins, CD .
BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND EVOLUTION, 1997, 49 (06) :324-350
[3]  
ALVESGOMES JA, 1995, MOL BIOL EVOL, V12, P298
[4]   THE FINE-STRUCTURE OF AMPULLARY AND TUBEROUS ELECTRORECEPTORS IN THE SOUTH-AMERICAN BLIND CATFISH PSEUDOCETOPSIS-SPEC [J].
ANDRES, KH ;
VONDURING, M ;
PETRASCH, E .
ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 1988, 177 (06) :523-535
[5]   Temperature sensitivity of the electric organ discharge waveform in Gymnotus carapo [J].
Ardanaz, JL ;
Silva, A ;
Macadar, O .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 187 (11) :853-864
[6]  
Bass A.H., 1986, P13
[7]   FREQUENCY-RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF ELECTRORECEPTORS IN WEAKLY ELECTRIC FISH (GYMNOTOIDEI) WITH A PULSE DISCHARGE [J].
BASTIAN, J .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 112 (02) :165-180
[8]   MODES OF OPERATION OF ELECTRIC ORGANS [J].
BENNETT, MV .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1961, 94 (02) :458-&
[9]  
Bennett MVL., 1971, FISH PHYSIOL, V5, P347, DOI [10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60051-5, DOI 10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60051-5]
[10]   ENVIRONMENTAL-INFLUENCES ON ACOUSTIC AND ELECTRIC ANIMAL COMMUNICATION [J].
BRENOWITZ, EA .
BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND EVOLUTION, 1986, 28 (1-3) :32-42