Faulty segments of scientometrics

被引：3

作者：

Motroshilova, N. V. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] RAS, Inst Philosophy, Moscow, Russia

来源：

HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | 2011年 / 81卷 / 01期

关键词：

International Discourse; Foreign Publication; Russian Author; Russian Philosopher; Philosophy Journal;

D O I：

10.1134/S1019331611010102

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

Just like any professional community, scientists are interested in an unbiased and, as far as possible, accurate assessment of their activity. Scientometric methods, which underlie the attempts to make qualitative conclusions about the achievements of individual scientists, research teams, and countries, have been becoming increasingly popular over the last several decades. The question whether results based on quantitative assessments are objective has been debated heatedly for a long time, including on the pages of our journal. The readers may familiarize themselves with another interested opinion and join the discussion.

引用

页码：51 / 61

页数：11