Assessment of Seismic Vulnerability of Steel and RC Moment Buildings Using HAZUS and Statistical Methodologies

被引:8
|
作者
Mansouri, Iman [1 ]
Hu, Jong Wan [2 ,3 ]
Shakeri, Kazem [4 ]
Shahbazi, Shahrokh [5 ]
Nouri, Bahareh [4 ]
机构
[1] Birjand Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Birjand 97175569, Iran
[2] Incheon Natl Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 12-1 Songdo Dong, Incheon 406840, South Korea
[3] Incheon Natl Univ, Incheon Disaster Prevent Res Ctr, 12-1 Songdo Dong, Incheon 406840, South Korea
[4] Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Fac Engn, Ardebil 5619911367, Iran
[5] TAAT Investment Grp, Tehran 1871713553, Iran
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
FRAGILITY;
D O I
10.1155/2017/2698932
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Designer engineers have always the serious challenge regarding the choice of the kind of structures to use in the areas with significant seismic activities. Development of fragility curve provides an opportunity for designers to select a structure that will have the least fragility. This paper presents an investigation into the seismic vulnerability of both steel and reinforced concrete (RC) moment frames using fragility curves obtained by HAZUS and statistical methodologies. Fragility curves are employed for several probability parameters. Fragility curves are used to assess several probability parameters. Furthermore, it examines whether the probability of the exceedence of the damage limit state is reduced as expected. Nonlinear dynamic analyses of five-, eight-, and twelve-story frames are carried out using Perform 3D. The definition of damage states is based on the descriptions provided by HAZUS, which gives the limit states and the associated interstory drift limits for structures. The fragility curves show that the HAZUS procedure reduces probability of damage, and this reduction is higher for RC frames. Generally, the RC frames have higher fragility compared to steel frames.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Indian Code Compliant RC Frame Buildings
    Gondaliya, Kaushik M.
    Amin, Jignesh
    Bhaiya, Vishisht
    Vasanwala, Sandip
    Desai, Atul K.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 11 (01) : 207 - 231
  • [2] Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings
    Pitilakis, K. D.
    Karapetrou, S. T.
    Fotopoulou, S. D.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 12 (04) : 1755 - 1776
  • [3] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of RC Frame Buildings Designed Using the DDBD Approach: A Parametric Study
    Palsanawala, Twinsy N.
    Gondaliya, Kaushik M.
    Bhaiya, Vishisht
    Vasanwala, Sandip A.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 12 (02) : 2319 - 2334
  • [4] Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings under the Effect of Aging
    Karapetrou, S. T.
    Fotopoulou, S. D.
    Pitilakis, K. D.
    SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE, 2017, 38 : 461 - 468
  • [5] Seismic vulnerability assessment of Portuguese masonry buildings
    Lovon, Holger
    Silva, Vitor
    Vicente, Romeu
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 55 : 853 - 865
  • [6] Robustness assessment of RC buildings by analysis of fragility and vulnerability
    Cokic, Milos
    Folic, Radomir
    Folic, Boris
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 62
  • [7] Fragility curves for assessment of seismic vulnerability of buildings on slopes
    Magapu, Subhash
    Setia, Saraswati
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 173
  • [8] Seismic resilience index for RC moment frames of school buildings using neuro-fuzzy approach
    Mahdieh Chalabi
    Hosein Naderpour
    Masoomeh Mirrashid
    Natural Hazards, 2022, 114 : 1 - 26
  • [9] Seismic resilience index for RC moment frames of school buildings using neuro-fuzzy approach
    Chalabi, Mahdieh
    Naderpour, Hosein
    Mirrashid, Masoomeh
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 114 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [10] Site classes effect on seismic vulnerability evaluation of RC precast industrial buildings
    Yesilyurt, Ali
    Zulfikar, Abdullah C.
    Tuzun, Cuneyt
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 21 (06) : 627 - 639