Exoskeleton for post-stroke recovery of ambulation (ExStRA): study protocol for a mixed-methods study investigating the efficacy and acceptance of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program during stroke inpatient rehabilitation

被引:34
作者
Louie, Dennis R. [1 ,2 ]
Mortenson, William B. [2 ,3 ]
Durocher, Melanie [4 ]
Teasell, Robert [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Yao, Jennifer [8 ,9 ]
Eng, Janice J. [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Grad Program Rehabil Sci, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Rehabil Res Program, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Alberta Hlth Serv, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Lawson Hlth Res Inst, Parkwood Inst Res, London, ON, Canada
[6] St Josephs Hlth Care London, Parkwood Inst, London, ON, Canada
[7] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
[8] Univ British Columbia, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[9] Vancouver Coastal Hlth, GF Strong Rehabil Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[10] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Fac Med, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Stroke; Rehabilitation; Exoskeleton; Walking; Clinical trial; BERG BALANCE SCALE; DISCHARGE DESTINATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS; WALKING FUNCTION; RISK-FACTORS; INDIVIDUALS; TRUSTWORTHINESS; RECOMMENDATIONS; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-020-1617-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The ability to walk is commonly reported as a top rehabilitation priority for individuals after a stroke. However, not all individuals with stroke are able to practice walking, especially those who require more assistance from their therapist to do so. Powered robotic exoskeletons are a new generation of robotic-assisted gait training devices, designed to assist lower extremity movement to allow repetitious overground walking practice. To date, minimal research has been conducted on the use of an exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke. The following research protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability, and thus adoptability, of an exoskeleton-based gait rehabilitation program for individuals with stroke. Methods This research protocol describes a prospective, multi-center, mixed-methods study comprised of a randomized controlled trial and a nested qualitative study. Forty adults with subacute stroke will be recruited from three inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and randomized to receive either the exoskeleton-based gait rehabilitation program or usual physical therapy care. The primary outcome measure is the Functional Ambulation Category at post-intervention, and secondary outcomes include motor recovery, functional mobility, cognitive, and quality-of-life measures. Outcome data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6 months. The qualitative component will explore the experience and acceptability of using a powered robotic exoskeleton for stroke rehabilitation from the point of view of individuals with stroke and physical therapists. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants who receive the exoskeleton intervention, and with the therapists who provide the intervention. Qualitative data will be analyzed using interpretive description. Discussion This study will be the first mixed-methods study examining the adoptability of exoskeleton-based rehabilitation for individuals with stroke. It will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy of exoskeleton-based training for walking recovery and will shed light on how physical therapists and patients with stroke perceive the device. The findings will help guide the integration of robotic exoskeletons into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [41] Do powered over-ground lower limb robotic exoskeletons affect outcomes in the rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury?
    Postol, Nicola
    Marquez, Jodie
    Spartalis, Stephanie
    Bivard, Andrew
    Spratt, Neil James
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (08) : 764 - 775
  • [42] Disparity Between Functional Recovery and Daily Use of the Upper and Lower Extremities During Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation
    Rand, Debbie
    Eng, Janice J.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2012, 26 (01) : 76 - 84
  • [43] Sandelowski M, 2000, RES NURS HEALTH, V23, P334, DOI 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO
  • [44] 2-G
  • [45] Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
    Saunders, Benjamin
    Sim, Julius
    Kingstone, Tom
    Baker, Shula
    Waterfield, Jackie
    Bartlam, Bernadette
    Burroughs, Heather
    Jinks, Clare
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2018, 52 (04) : 1893 - 1907
  • [46] Predicting Walking Function of Patients One Month Poststroke Using Modified Rivermead Mobility Index on Admission
    Shum, Sze-Tim
    Chiu, Joseph Kam-Wah
    Tsang, Claudia Pui-Ling
    Wong, Chris Hiu-Po
    Tsang, Raymond Chi-Chung
    Ma, Sau-Lai
    Ho, Yuk Lai
    Tsang, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 23 (08) : 2117 - 2121
  • [47] The Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Persons With Mild Subacute Stroke: Relationship to Functional Outcome
    Toglia, Joan
    Fitzgerald, Kerri A.
    O'Dell, Michael W.
    Mastrogiovanni, Andrea R.
    Lin, C. David
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (05): : 792 - 798
  • [48] Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
    Tong, Allison
    Sainsbury, Peter
    Craig, Jonathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 19 (06) : 349 - 357
  • [49] Why effectiveness of robot-mediated neurorehabilitation does not necessarily influence its adoption
    Turchetti, Giuseppe
    Vitiello, Nicola
    Trieste, Leopoldo
    Romiti, Stefano
    Geisler, Elie
    Micera, Silvestro
    [J]. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 7 : 143 - 153
  • [50] Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials
    Twisk, J.
    Bosman, L.
    Hoekstra, T.
    Rijnhart, J.
    Welten, M.
    Heymans, M.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 10 : 80 - 85