Toward an Ethically Responsible Approach to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

被引:14
作者
Lyerly, Anne Drapkin [1 ,2 ]
Little, Margaret Olivia [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Trent Ctr Bioeth Humanities & Hist Med, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Kennedy Inst Eth, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Dept Philosophy, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
vaginal birth after cesarean; ethics; birth; childbirth; guideline development; decision making; AUTONOMY; DELIVERY; TRIAL; LABOR;
D O I
10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Determining approach to delivery after a previous cesarean is among the most contentious areas of obstetrics. We present a framework for ethically responsible guidelines and practice regarding vaginal birth after cesarean. We describe ethical complexities of 3 key issues that mark the debate: the cesarean delivery rate, safety, and patient autonomy. We then describe a taxonomy of considerations that should inform a responsible framework for guideline development and highlight critical distinctions between types of guidelines that have been blurred in the past. We then forward 2 central claims. First, in otherwise uncomplicated birth after a single previous cesarean, both vaginal birth after cesarean and repeat cesarean should be regarded as reasonable options; women, rather than policymakers, providers, insurance carriers, or hospitals, should determine delivery approach. Second, in complicated cases, providers and policymakers should carefully calibrate the strength of evidence to ensure differential risk and cost are adequate to justify directive guidelines given important variations in values women bring to childbirth. Semin Perinatol 34:337-344 (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 344
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1999, ACOG PRACT B, V5
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2009, VAG DEL PRIOR CES BI
[3]   PROTECTING THE LIBERTY OF PREGNANT PATIENTS [J].
ANNAS, GJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 316 (19) :1213-1214
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics Gynecology, V106, P1127, DOI https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200511000-00058
[6]  
[Anonymous], AHRQ PUBLICATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, OBSTET GYNECOL, V104, P203
[8]   Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil:: population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic an epidemiological methods [J].
Béhague, DP ;
Victora, CG ;
Barros, FC .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7343) :942-+
[9]   Bad medicine and bad law - Commentary [J].
Bewley, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7088) :1184-1185
[10]  
D'Alton ME, 2006, OBSTET GYNECOL, V107, P1386