Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women

被引:52
作者
Jokela, Markus [1 ]
Rotkirch, Anna [2 ]
Rickard, Ian J. [3 ]
Pettay, Jenni [4 ]
Lummaa, Virpi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Psychol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Vaestoliitto, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Turku, Sect Ecol, Dept Biol, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
关键词
humans; mating system; remarriage; reproductive strategy; sexual selection; SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY; INFIDELITY; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; FERTILITY; CHILDREN; INVESTMENT; ADULTHOOD; PATERNITY; MARRIAGE;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arq078
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evolutionary theory predicts that males seek more sexual partners than females because of their higher fitness benefits from such a reproductive strategy. Accordingly, variance in numbers of partners and offspring is expected to be greater and association between mating and reproductive success to be stronger in males. Studies testing key predictions of this hypothesis in humans are lacking. Using data of 3700 men and 4010 women living in contemporary United States, we examined sex differences in the variance of number of spouses and offspring and in the association between spouse number and number of offspring. The results suggested a stronger selective advantage of serial monogamy in men than in women. Variance in spouse and offspring number was, respectively, 5% and 10% higher in men. In addition, the association between mating and reproductive success was stronger in men, so that men with 3 or more consecutive spouses had 19% more children than men with only spouse, whereas spouse number beyond the first partner was not associated with number of children in women. When the sample was stratified by ethnic group, the sex differences were stronger among Black and Hispanic participants than among White participants.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 912
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Some bold evolutionary predictions for the future of mating in humans [J].
Aarssen, Lonnie W. .
OIKOS, 2007, 116 (10) :1768-1778
[2]   How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Evidence from worldwide nonpaternity rates [J].
Anderson, Kermyt G. .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2006, 47 (03) :513-520
[3]  
[Anonymous], STAT ABSTR US
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES, DOI [10.4324/9781315129266-7, DOI 10.4324/9781315129266-7, DOI 10.1002/AJPA.1330400226]
[5]   BATEMAN PRINCIPLES AND THE MEASUREMENT OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN PLANTS AND ANIMALS [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 :S126-S149
[6]   ANIMAL MATING SYSTEMS - A SYNTHESIS BASED ON SELECTION THEORY [J].
ARNOLD, SJ ;
DUVALL, D .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 143 (02) :317-348
[7]   Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample [J].
Atkins, DC ;
Baucom, DH ;
Jacobson, NS .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) :735-749
[8]   INTRA-SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA [J].
BATEMAN, AJ .
HEREDITY, 1948, 2 (03) :349-368
[9]   Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences [J].
Bellis, MA ;
Hughes, K ;
Hughes, S ;
Ashton, JR .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (09) :749-754
[10]  
BORGERHOFF MM, 1987, AM ANTHROPOL, V89, P617, DOI DOI 10.1525/AA.1987.89.3.02A00050)