Comparison of solid waste management scenarios based on life cycle analysis and multi-criteria decision making (Case study: Isfahan city)

被引:0
作者
Nouri, J. [1 ]
Omrani, Gh. Ali [1 ]
Arjmandi, R. [1 ]
Kermani, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
来源
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSACTION A-SCIENCE | 2014年 / 38卷 / A3期
关键词
Waste Management Scenario; life cycle assessment; TOPSIS; Isfahan; LCA; OPTIONS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the decision support systems which can be considered for assessing the different approaches of Waste Management. However, it only considers environmental effects and ignores other decision making options such as economic and social effects of solid waste management. In this research, we consider a combination of three decision making options including environmental, economic and social effects to compare current waste management system to six alternative scenarios for selecting the best scenario of solid waste management for Isfahan city where a total of approximately 1000 tons/day of waste is generated. SimaPro7 libraries through Eco-Indictor 99 method were used to obtain background data for the life cycle inventory and assessing mid and end points of environmental impacts. One ton of municipal solid waste of Isfahan was selected as the functional unit. Output of LCA along Economic and social effects were compared with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method. According to Multi-criteria Decision Making, S5 and Si (recycling, composting and landfilling) were selected as best scenario in terms of lower environmental impacts (human health, ecosystem quality and resources) and finance requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey [J].
Banar, Mufide ;
Cokaygil, Zerrin ;
Ozkan, Aysun .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (01) :54-62
[2]  
Bjamadottir H. J., 2002, GUIDELINES USE LCA W
[3]   LCA of integrated MSW management systems: Case study of the bologna district [J].
Buttol, P. ;
Masoni, P. ;
Bonoli, A. ;
Goldoni, S. ;
Belladonna, V. ;
Cavazzuti, C. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) :1059-1070
[4]   A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems [J].
Chang, NB ;
Wang, SF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 99 (02) :303-321
[5]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Bargigli, Silvia ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (12) :2116-2123
[6]   Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: Energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Bargigli, Silvia ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (12) :2552-2564
[7]   The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system [J].
De Feo, Giovanni ;
Malvano, Carmela .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (06) :1901-1915
[8]   Solid waste management in urban areas development and application of a decision support system [J].
Fiorucci, P ;
Minciardi, R ;
Robba, M ;
Sacile, R .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2003, 37 (04) :301-328
[9]  
Geodkoop M., 2004, INTRO LCA SIMAPRO PR
[10]   A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL FOR SOLID-WASTE MANAGEMENT WITH APPLICATION [J].
GOTTINGER, HW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 35 (03) :350-364