Mergers and Acquisitions Strategies for Industry Leaders, Challengers, and Niche Players: Interaction Effects of Technology Positioning and Industrial Environment

被引:12
|
作者
Lin, Bou-Wen [1 ]
Chen, Wan-Chen [2 ]
Chu, Po-Young [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Technol Transfer & Business Incubat Ctr, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Management Sci, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
关键词
Industry challenger; industry environment; industry leader; market position; mergers and acquisitions (M&As); niche player; technological positioning; R-AND-D; MARKET SHARE; PERFORMANCE; STOCK; UNCERTAINTY; CONSEQUENCES; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; ALLIANCES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2014.2380822
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study empirically investigates the merger and acquisition (M&A) strategies of focal firms by considering their market and technology position at the industry level. The results obtained using patents, firm M&A agreements, and the financial data of U.S. technology firms from 1997 through 2008 demonstrate how industry leaders, challengers, and niche players differ in their M&A strategic logic. Three industry environmental factors and two technology positioning factors exhibit different effects on firms' M&A strategies for varied market positions. The overall patterns reveal that niche players are more aggressive in leveraging their technology positions to adopt M&As for the purpose of acquiring access to external knowledge resources, while leaders tend to leverage their market positions and use M&As to further strengthen their market power. Challengers are more likely to engage in M&As when locating in unfavorable environmental markets, but they are less likely to engage in M&As when locating in technologically crowded areas.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Equity versus non-equity partnership strategies for leaders, challengers, and niche players
    Chen, Wan-Chen
    Lin, Bou-Wen
    2017 IEEE TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY CONFERENCE (TEMSCON), 2017, : 252 - 259