The effect of the shock index and scoring systems for predicting mortality among geriatric patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective cohort study

被引:2
|
作者
Dogru, Umran [1 ]
Yuksel, Melih [1 ]
Ay, Mehmet Oguzhan [1 ]
Kaya, Halil [1 ]
Ozdemir, Aksel [1 ]
Isler, Yesim [1 ]
Bulut, Mehtap [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Bursa, Turkey
来源
SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
Emergencies; Geriatrics; Mortality; GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD SCORE; RISK STRATIFICATION;
D O I
10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0735.13102021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is an important cause of mortality and morbidity among geriatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the shock index and other scoring systems are effective predictors of mortality and prognosis among geriatric patients presenting to the emergency department with complaints of upper GI bleeding. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in an emergency department in Bursa, Turkey. METHODS: Patients over 65 years admitted to a single-center, tertiary emergency service between May 8, 2019, and April 30, 2020, and diagnosed with upper GI bleeding were analyzed. 30, 180 and 360-day mortality prediction performances of the shock index and the Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS-65 scores were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. The shock index (P < 0.001) and AIMS-65 score (P < 0.05) of the patients who died within the 30-day period were found to be significantly different, while the shock index (P < 0.001), Rockall score (P < 0.001) and AIMS-65 score (P < 0.05) of patients who died within the 180-day and 360- day periods were statistically different. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for predicting 360-day mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) value was found to be 0.988 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.971-1.000; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The shock index measured among geriatric patients with upper GI bleeding at admission seems to be a more effective predictor of prognosis than other scoring systems.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 539
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study
    Zhong, Min
    Chen, Wan Jun
    Lu, Xiao Ye
    Qian, Jie
    Zhu, Chang Qing
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2016, 17 (12) : 820 - 828
  • [2] Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study
    Yang, Hae Min
    Jeon, Seong Woo
    Jung, Jin Tae
    Lee, Dong Wook
    Ha, Chang Yoon
    Park, Kyung Sik
    Lee, Si Hyung
    Yang, Chang Heon
    Park, Jun Hyung
    Park, Youn Sun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [3] Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED
    Tang, Yuedong
    Shen, Jie
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhou, Xiaoyong
    Tang, Zhongyan
    You, Tingting
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [4] Comparison of scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study
    Prasitvarakul, Kamales
    Attanath, Nawawich
    Chang, Arunchai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (02) : 474 - 483
  • [5] The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Saffouri, Eliana
    Blackwell, Clare
    Laursen, Stig B.
    Laine, Loren
    Dalton, Harry R.
    Ngu, Jing
    Shultz, Michael
    Norton, Rebecca
    Stanley, Adrian J.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 51 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [6] AIMS65 score and shock index in predicting mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding AIMS65 score and shock index in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Doganay, Fatih
    Yilmaz, Erdal
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 : 483 - 487
  • [7] Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study
    Stanley, Adrian J.
    Laine, Loren
    Dalton, Harry R.
    Ngu, Jing H.
    Schultz, Michael
    Abazi, Roseta
    Zakko, Liam
    Thornton, Susan
    Wilkinson, Kelly
    Khor, Cristopher J. L.
    Murray, Iain A.
    Laursen, Stig B.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [8] Predictors of Mortality in Geriatric Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Emektar, Emine
    Dagar, Seda
    Corbacioglu, Seref Kerem
    Uzunosmanoglu, Huseyin
    Uzman, Metin
    Karaatli, Rabia Handan
    Cevik, Yunsur
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (04) : 197 - 202
  • [9] Limits of pre-endoscopic scoring systems in geriatric patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Di Gioia, Giuseppe
    Sangineto, Moris
    Paglia, Annalisa
    Cornacchia, Maria Giulia
    Parente, Fernando
    Serviddio, Gaetano
    Romano, Antonino Davide
    Villani, Rosanna
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [10] Comparison of risk scoring systems for critical care patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predicting mortality and length of stay
    Lincoln, Marc
    Keating, Niamh
    O'Loughlin, Christopher
    Tam, Angus
    O'Kane, Molly Murphy
    MacCarthy, Finbar
    O'Connor, Enda
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2022, 54 (04) : 310 - 314