Towards access for all? Policy and research on access of ethnic minority groups to natural areas in four European countries

被引:40
作者
Jay, Marion [1 ]
Peters, Karin [2 ]
Buijs, Arjen E. [3 ]
Gentin, Sandra [4 ]
Kloek, Marjolein E. [5 ]
O'Brien, Liz [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Forest & Environm Policy, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Wageningen Univ, Sociospatial Anal Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ & Alterra Green World Res, Forest & Nat Policy Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Copenhagen, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Wageningen Univ, Nat Conservat & Plant Ecol Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[6] Alice Holt Lodge, Forest Res, Farnham GU10 4LH, Surrey, England
关键词
Ethnicity; Outdoor recreation; Natural areas; Europe; Policy; Immigrants; OUTDOOR RECREATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Migration and growing ethnic diversity pose new questions for forest and nature policy and research, especially on the equality of access to natural areas. This paper compares national approaches in policy and research on ethnic minority groups' access to natural areas in four Western-European countries: the United Kingdom (UK), The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark It shows that powerful linkages exist between immigration history, national research traditions and national policy regarding the attention given to this-issue, the topics of interest and the ethnicity categories used. The main forest and nature policy documents in The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark address issues of access to nature generally, while in the UK reducing discrimination of ethnic minority groups in access to nature is a formalised objective to be addressed by public bodies. Research in the UK focuses on evidences of under-representation, discrimination and barriers to access. In turn, German and Danish research emphasises different recreational uses of ethnic groups and is less oriented towards the implementation of targeted management objectives. The Netherlands occupy an intermediary position. We argue that international exchange of scientific results and cross-national studies could improve our understanding of cultural differences in recreational patterns, experiences, barriers, images of nature, and planning and design strategies. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 11
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Agyeman Julian., 1990, Built Environment, V16, P232
[2]  
[Anonymous], UK FOR STAND GOV APP
[3]   Crossing divides: Ethnicity and rurality [J].
Askins, Kye .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2009, 25 (04) :365-375
[4]  
BMVEL, 2004, NAT WALDPR GES DIAL
[5]  
BOMMES M, 2010, NATL PARADIGMS MIGRA, V13, P127
[6]  
Borkert MarenBosswick., 2007, Local integration policies for migrants in Europe
[7]   Beyond environmental frames: The social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland [J].
Buijs, Arjen E. ;
Arts, Bas J. M. ;
Elands, Birgit H. M. ;
Lengkeek, Jaap .
GEOFORUM, 2011, 42 (03) :329-341
[8]   Lay People's Images of Nature: Comprehensive Frameworks of Values, Beliefs, and Value Orientations [J].
Buijs, Arjen E. .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2009, 22 (05) :417-432
[9]   No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences [J].
Buijs, Arjen E. ;
Elands, Birgit H. M. ;
Langers, Fransje .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2009, 91 (03) :113-123
[10]  
*DAN FOR NAT AG, 2002, DAN NAT FOR PROGR IN