Effects of experience and uncertainty during dynamic decision making

被引:40
作者
Kobus, DA
Proctor, S
Holste, S
机构
[1] Pacific Sci & Engn Grp Inc, San Diego, CA 92122 USA
[2] Space & Warfare Syst Command, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
uncertainty; situation awareness; response selection; experience; dynamic task; COA;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00022-1
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The decision response times in a dynamic tactical scenario in which participants interacted with a virtual command-post environment was investigated. Fifty-two Marines with varying amounts of command-post experience assessed the situation as it developed, determined tactical leverage points, formed a plan of action, and submitted battle orders. Two scenarios were studied-each differed in the level of certainty in the information provided. The tactical decision process was modeled and analyzed in the following sequential, cognitive stages: situation assessment, course of action selection, course of action execution. Results show that the time required to assess the situation was significantly longer (p < 0.05), for the high-experience group than the low-experience group. However, once the assessment was complete, the selection of a course of action (COA) was significantly faster for the high-experience group than the low-experience group. In addition, COA selection under conditions of low certainty was significantly longer than under conditions of high certainty. Time required for COA execution indicated a significant main effect of experience (p < 0.05), a main effect of task certainty approaching statistical significance (p = 0.067), and a statistically significant interaction (p < 0.05). These results indicate that the time needed to execute the COA, once determined, is significantly less for the highly experienced individuals under conditions of low certainty. However, under the conditions of high certainty, no statistically significant time differences were found based upon the experience level. The high-experience group was significantly more accurate than the low-experience group for developing an appropriate COA. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 290
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Uncertainty and decision making: Volcanic crisis scenarios [J].
Doyle, Emma E. H. ;
McClure, John ;
Paton, Douglas ;
Johnston, David M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2014, 10 :75-101
[42]   Decision making under uncertainty with fuzzy targets [J].
Van-Nam Huynh ;
Yoshiteru Nakamori ;
Mina Ryoke ;
Tu-Bao Ho .
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2007, 6 :255-278
[43]   Disagreement-based uncertainty for decision making [J].
Ongaro, Malvina .
SYNTHESE, 2025, 205 (05)
[44]   Decision making under uncertainty in electricity markets [J].
Barroso, L. A. ;
Conejo, A. J. .
2006 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-9, 2006, :4132-4134
[45]   Farm decision making under risk and uncertainty [J].
Backus, GBC ;
Eidman, VR ;
Dijkhuizen, AA .
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1997, 45 (02) :307-328
[46]   A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty [J].
Keith, Andrew J. ;
Ahner, Darryl K. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 300 (02) :319-353
[47]   Decision making under uncertainty with ordinal information [J].
Yager, RR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1999, 7 (05) :483-500
[48]   IMPORTANCE OF SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY IN DECISION-MAKING [J].
RECKHOW, KH .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1994, 18 (02) :161-166
[49]   On the inclusion of variance in decision making under uncertainty [J].
Yager, RR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1996, 4 (05) :401-419
[50]   Features of decision making and leadership in the uncertainty conditions [J].
Vashurina, Ekaterina ;
Bazarov, Takhir .
ORGANIZATSIONNAYA PSIKOLOGIYA, 2020, 10 (03) :185-206