The Flex-Tip™ tracheal tube does not reduce the incidence of postoperative sore throat: a randomized controlled trial

被引:10
作者
Turkstra, Timothy P. [1 ,2 ]
Smitheram, Amanda K. [2 ]
Alabdulhadi, Osama [2 ]
Youssef, Hesham [2 ]
Jones, Philip M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Univ Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 2011年 / 58卷 / 12期
关键词
INTUBATION; HOARSENESS; ANESTHESIA; CUFF; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-011-9592-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose Sore throat after tracheal intubation is common with an incidence of 30-70%. The Parker Flex-Tip (TM) endotracheal tube (ETT) is designed to reduce trauma during ETT placement. This randomized single-blinded trial was designed to assess whether using the Flex-Tip ETT would reduce the incidence of postoperative sore throat and/or vocal change. Methods A Flex-Tip or a Mallinckrodt Hi-LoA (R) cuffed ETT was used by random allocation in 200 patients with normal-appearing airways requiring elective orotracheal intubation. On the second postoperative day, a blinded assessor recorded the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and voice alteration. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate or severe sore throat. Secondary outcomes included vocal change, time to intubation, number of attempts/failures, incidence of oropharyngeal bleeding, and subjective ease of intubation. Results Demographic data were similar between the two groups. Moderate or severe sore throat was observed in 12% of patients with the Flex-Tip ETT and 6% of patients with the Mallinckrodt Hi-Lo ETT (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.70 to 7.1; P = 0.14). The incidence of moderate or severe vocal change was 6% and 3%, respectively (OR 2.0; 95% CI 0.42 to 12.9; P = 0.50). Time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, incidence of oropharyngeal bleeding, and ease of intubation did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion In this study involving experienced clinicians, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative sore throat or vocal change between the Flex-Tip ETT and the standard Mallinckrodt Hi-Lo cuffed ETT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01095861.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1096
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   POSTOPERATIVE THROAT COMPLAINTS AFTER TRACHEAL INTUBATION [J].
CHRISTENSEN, AM ;
WILLEMOESLARSEN, H ;
LUNDBY, L ;
JAKOBSEN, KB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (06) :786-787
[2]   Strepsils® Tablets Reduce Sore Throat and Hoarseness After Tracheal Intubation [J].
Ebneshahidi, Amin ;
Mohseni, Masood .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (04) :892-894
[3]  
FOWLER MA, 2009, CLIN ANESTH, P1438
[4]   INTERVIEW METHOD AFFECTS INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE SORE THROAT [J].
HARDING, CJ ;
MCVEY, FK .
ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 42 (10) :1104-1107
[5]   Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery [J].
Higgins, PP ;
Chung, F ;
Mezei, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (04) :582-584
[6]   Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice [J].
Holden, JD .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (01) :65-70
[7]   Effect on Postoperative Sore Throat of Spraying the Endotracheal Tube Cuff with Benzydamine Hydrochloride, 10% Lidocaine, and 2% Lidocaine [J].
Hung, Nan-Kai ;
Wu, Ching-Tang ;
Chan, Shun-Ming ;
Lu, Chueng-He ;
Huang, Yuan-Shiou ;
Yeh, Chun-Chang ;
Lee, Meei-Shyuan ;
Cherng, Chen-Hwan .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (04) :882-886
[8]   SORE THROAT AFTER OPERATION - INFLUENCE OF TRACHEAL INTUBATION, INTRACUFF PRESSURE AND TYPE OF CUFF [J].
JENSEN, PJ ;
HOMMELGAARD, P ;
SONDERGAARD, P ;
ERIKSEN, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 54 (04) :453-457
[9]  
Joo HS, 2005, CAN J ANAESTH, V52, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF03016067
[10]   The Parker Flex-Tip tube versus a standard tube for fiberoptic orotracheal intubation - A randomized double-blind study [J].
Kristensen, MS .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (02) :354-358