Academic Dishonesty, Self-Control, and General Criminality: A Prospective and Retrospective Study of Academic Dishonesty in a New Zealand University

被引:31
作者
Williams, Mei Wah M. [1 ]
Williams, Matthew Neil [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Psychol, Auckland 0745, New Zealand
关键词
academic dishonesty; self-control; general criminality; past academic dishonesty; prospective and retrospective study; ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; SOCIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS; CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES; CHEATING BEHAVIORS; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; EMPIRICAL-TEST; CONTROL SCALE; CRIME; DELINQUENCY;
D O I
10.1080/10508422.2011.653291
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Academic dishonesty is an insidious problem that besets most tertiary institutions, where considerable resources are expended to prevent and manage students' dishonest actions within academia. Using a mixed retrospective and prospective design this research investigated Gottfredson and Hirschi's self-control theory as a possible explanation for academic dishonesty in 264 university students. The relationship between academic dishonesty and general criminality was also examined. A significant but small to moderate relationship between academic dishonesty and general criminality was present, including correlations with general dishonesty, violent crime and drug offending sub-categories. These findings suggested that a general criminological theory may be of use in explaining academic dishonesty, but the overall ability of self-control variables to explain academic dishonesty was not strong. Controlled logistic regressions indicated that a significant positive association with academic dishonesty was only present for one of 6 self-control subscales (self-centeredness), and even this association was only present in the prospective study component. A strong relationship between past and future academic dishonesty was present. Implications of the study for institutions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 112
页数:24
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], QUALITATIVE STUDIES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, International Journal of Educational Management
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HDB SELF REGULATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI DOI 10.1080/02602930600679415
[5]   Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others [J].
Antes, Alison L. ;
Brown, Ryan P. ;
Murphy, Stephen T. ;
Waples, Ethan P. ;
Mumford, Michael D. ;
Connelly, Shane ;
Devenport, Lynn D. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2007, 2 (04) :15-34
[6]  
Arneklev B.J., 1993, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V9, P225, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01064461, 10.1007/bf01064461]
[7]   Self-control as an executive function - Reformulating gottfredson and hirschi's parental socialization thesis [J].
Beaver, Kevin M. ;
Wright, John Paul ;
Delisi, Matt .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2007, 34 (10) :1345-1361
[8]   Relation of general deviance to academic dishonesty [J].
Blankenship, KL ;
Whitley, BE .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 10 (01) :1-12
[9]   Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty [J].
Bolin, AU .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 138 (02) :101-114
[10]   Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities [J].
Brimble, Mark ;
Stevenson-Clarke, Peta .
AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2005, 32 (03) :19-44