Abduction and Modality

被引:22
作者
Biggs, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS; SUPERVENIENCE; ESSENTIALISM; METAPHYSICS; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00412.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a modal epistemology that centers on inference to the best explanation (i.e. abduction). In introducing this abduction-centered modal epistemology, the paper has two main goals. First, it seeks to provide reasons for pursuing an abduction-centered modal epistemology by showing that this epistemology aids a popular stance on the mind-body problem and allows an appealing approach to modality. Second, the paper seeks to show that an abduction-centered modal epistemology can work by showing that abduction can establish claims about necessity/possibility (i.e. modal claims)-where 'necessity' and 'possibility' denote metaphysical necessity and possibility, ways things may or may not have been given how they actually are.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 326
页数:44
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW 9
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS MATH SELECTED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, NAMING NECESSITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, RETHINKING INTUITION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511583308
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Inference to the Best Explanation
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1990, NATURE CONSCIOUSNESS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT