Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II

被引:9
|
作者
Liu, Yanglu [1 ]
Yin, Qiaozhi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Fan [3 ]
Luo, Shuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Sch Med & Life Sci, 37 Twelfth Bridge Rd, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Chinese Med, Chengdu Hosp Reprod Women & Children, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Nanchong Cent Hosp, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Suining Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Suinig, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
High intensity focused ultrasound; Cesarean scar pregnancy; Ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (USg-D&C) for two types patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP-I and CSP-II). Materials and methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 CSP-I patients and 52 CSP-II patients who received HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C from Jun 2014 to Oct 2020. The diameter of gestational sac/mass, thickness of the intervening myometrium, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stays, adverse effects and beta-HCG level in the two groups were compared. Results All patients successfully received HIFU ablation under conscious sedation. The median total treatment time of HIFU ablation and median USg-D&C time in the CSP-I group were statistically longer than those in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The average intraoperative median blood loss was 39 ml in the CSP-I group and 65 ml in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The duration of hospitalization was 7.07 +/- 1.83 days in the CSP-I group and 7.18 +/- 1.72 days in the CSP-II group (P > 0.05). The average time needed for beta-HCG return to normal levels was 26.08 +/- 5.02. and 28.15 +/- 4.99 days for CSP-I and CSP-II, respectively (P > 0.05). The percentage of adverse effects and complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C was safe and effective in treating the CSP-I patients and CSP-II patients, which may be a potential noninvasive therapeutic option for patients with CSP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
    Yanglu Liu
    Qiaozhi Yin
    Fan Xu
    Shuang Luo
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [2] Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Xiao, Juhua
    Zhang, Shouhua
    Wang, Fang
    Wang, Yuqin
    Shi, Zhen
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhou, Jinshui
    Huang, Jinshi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (04) : 356.e1 - 356.e7
  • [3] Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage at different time intervals for Cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study
    Peng, Yan
    Dai, Yu
    Wen, Cuili
    Yu, Guiyuan
    Jin, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2024, 41 (01)
  • [4] High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Huang, L.
    Du, Y.
    Zhao, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (01) : 98 - 101
  • [5] Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy
    Liu, Chen-Ning
    Tang, Li
    Sun, Yan
    Liu, Yu-Hui
    Yu, Hong-Jin
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (03): : 387 - 391
  • [6] Doppler Ultrasound Evaluation of the Efficacy of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Treatment of Cesarean Section Scar Pregnancy
    Huo, Xiaokai
    Xie, Yaozeng
    Yang, Lei
    Deng, Kun
    Liu, Yingying
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2020, 30 (03): : 240 - 244
  • [7] CESAREAN SCAR PREGNANCY: COMPARING THE EFFICACYAND TOLERABILITY OF TREATMENT WITH HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND AND UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION
    Xiao, Juhua
    Shi, Zhen
    Zhou, Jinshui
    Ye, Jun
    Zhu, Jianfang
    Zhou, Xin
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Shouhua
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 43 (03) : 640 - 647
  • [8] Treatment of cornual pregnancy in a patient with adenomyosis by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation A case report
    Yu, Lixia
    Xu, Linying
    Xu, Xiaoyan
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (48)
  • [9] High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies
    Yin, Yan
    Pan, Feibao
    He, Min
    Zhang, Cai
    Liu, Yang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2022, 39 (01) : 390 - 396
  • [10] The effect of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy on ovarian reserve
    Wang, Wenping
    Jiang, Jing
    Chen, Yan
    Li, Chengzhi
    Zhou, Honggui
    Wang, Zhibiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2021, 38 (01) : 1409 - 1414