A STUDY OF DIFFERENT METAMODELING TECHNIQUES FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

被引:0
作者
Noon, Christian [1 ]
Winer, Eliot [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Virtual Real Applicat Ctr, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 5, PTS A AND B: 35TH DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE | 2010年
关键词
KRIGING MODELS; APPROXIMATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many high fidelity analysis tools including finite-element analysis and computational fluid dynamics have become an integral part of the design process. However, these tools were developed for detailed design and are inadequate for conceptual design due to complexity and turnaround time. With the development of more complex technologies and systems, decisions made earlier in the design process have become crucial to product success. Therefore, one possible alternative to high fidelity analysis tools for conceptual design is metamodeling. Metamodels generated upon high fidelity analysis datasets from previous design iterations show large potential to represent the overall trends of the dataset. To determine which metamodeling techniques were best suited to handle high fidelity datasets for conceptual design, an implementation scheme for incorporating Polynomial Response Surface (PRS) methods, Kriging Approximations, and Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBFNN) was developed. This paper presents the development of a conceptual design metamodeling strategy. Initially high fidelity legacy datasets were generated from FEA simulations. Metamodels were then built upon the legacy datasets. Finally, metamodel performance was evaluated based upon several dataset conditions including various sample sizes, dataset linearity, interpolation within a domain, and extrapolation outside a domain.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 161
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METAMODELING TECHNIQUES BASED ON AN AGENT-BASED SUPPLY CHAIN MODEL
    Edali, Mert
    Yucel, Gonenc
    32ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (ECMS 2018), 2018, : 114 - 120
  • [42] An Active Learning Variable-Fidelity Metamodeling Approach for Engineering Design
    Zhou, Qi
    Jiang, Ping
    Zhou, Hui
    Shu, Leshi
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 411 - 415
  • [43] Optimal Design of PMSM Based on Automated Finite Element Analysis and Metamodeling
    You, Yong-Min
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (24)
  • [44] Conceptual design and evaluation of a novel bilateral pretension seatbelt: a computational study
    Du, Xianping
    Deng, Yufang
    Zhang, Guanjun
    Cao, Libo
    Zhu, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS, 2020, 25 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [45] Conceptual design of cogeneration plants under a resilient design perspective: Resilience metrics and case study
    Matelli, Jose Alexandre
    Goebel, Kai
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 215 : 736 - 750
  • [46] Metamodeling development for reliability-based design optimization of automotive body structure
    Zhu, Ping
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Guanlong
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2011, 62 (07) : 729 - 741
  • [47] Evaluation of convergence behavior of metamodeling techniques for bridging scales in multi-scale multimaterial simulation
    Sen, Oishik
    Davis, Sean
    Jacobs, Gustaaf
    Udaykumar, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2015, 294 : 585 - 604
  • [48] Conceptual Design of the Pedestrian Bridge
    Lu, Pengzhen
    Zhou, Yutao
    Lu, Qun
    Wang, Jiahao
    Shi, Qingtian
    Li, Dengguo
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (04) : 470 - 483
  • [49] Towards Dynamic Conceptual Design
    Grana, Roberto
    Manenti, Flavio
    Manca, Davide
    19TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2009, 26 : 665 - 670
  • [50] Effect of Different Approximation Techniques on Fractional-Order KHN Filter Design
    Hamed, Esraa M.
    AbdelAty, Amr M.
    Said, Lobna A.
    Radwan, Ahmed G.
    CIRCUITS SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 37 (12) : 5222 - 5252