The nonlinear effect of land freight structure on carbon emission intensity: new evidence from road and rail freight in China

被引:11
作者
Chen, Rujia [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoning [1 ]
Zhang, Yaping [1 ]
Luo, Qian [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Civil Aviat Adm China2, Res Inst 2, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Land freight structure; Carbon emission intensity; Nonlinear effect; Panel threshold model; Trade openness; CO2; EMISSIONS; TRANSPORT SECTOR; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; DRIVING FACTORS; REDUCTION; URBANIZATION; DETERMINANTS; IMPACTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-21352-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The extensive literature has debated the varying effects of factors on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. However, it has paid little attention to land freight structure (FS), including road and rail freight share, which may have different effects on CO2 emissions. Based on the data from 6 eastern provinces in China during 2005-2019, the panel threshold model is used to explore the dynamic influence mechanism of road and rail freight share on transport carbon emission intensity (CE), respectively. The results show different nonlinear relationships between the share of road and rail freight and transport carbon emission intensity. First, the effect of road freight share on carbon emission intensity is all positive across different stages of trade openness, while such effect goes through a process of increasing and then decreasing with the level of trade openness improving. Second, the driving effect of rail freight share on carbon emission intensity exhibits a "negative-positive-negative" feature as the level of trade openness increases. Third, trade openness generates a double-threshold effect on carbon emission intensity. The differentiated nonlinear effects provide significant evidence of the modal shift from road to rail freight, which would be effective to alleviate transport CO2 emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:78666 / 78682
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Transport energy consumption and environmental quality: Does urbanization matter? [J].
Adams, Samuel ;
Boateng, Elliot ;
Acheampong, Alex O. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 744
[3]   Study of the environmental Kuznets curve for transport carbon dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia [J].
Alshehry, Atef Saad ;
Belloumi, Mounir .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 :1339-1347
[4]   Driving factors of GHG emissions in the EU transport activity [J].
Andres, Lidia ;
Padilla, Emilio .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 61 :60-74
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, STUDY URBAN PASSENGE
[6]   Industrialization, Freight Transport and Environmental Quality: Evidence from Belt and Road Initiative Economies [J].
Anwar, Awais ;
Ahmad, Nawaz ;
Madni, Ghulam Rasool .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (07) :7053-7070
[7]   Transportation intensity, urbanization, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in the G-20 countries [J].
Arvin, Mak B. ;
Pradhan, Rudra P. ;
Norman, Neville R. .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 35 :50-66
[8]   Evaluation of the relationship between freight transport, energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions: the VECM approach [J].
Benali, Nadia ;
Feki, Rochdi .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (02) :1039-1049
[9]   The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies [J].
Chandran, V. G. R. ;
Tang, Chor Foon .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 :445-453
[10]   Investigating the links between ICTs, passenger transportation, and environmental sustainability [J].
Chatti, Walid ;
Majeed, Muhammad Tariq .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (18) :26564-26574