Preharvest bagging with wavelength-selective materials enhances development and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Nam Dok Mai #4

被引:43
作者
Chonhencho, Vanee [1 ,2 ]
Kamhangwong, Damrongpol [1 ]
Kruenate, Jittiporn [3 ]
Khongrat, Krittaphat [3 ]
Tangchantra, Nantavat [3 ]
Wichai, Uthai [4 ]
Singh, S. Paul [5 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Agroind, Dept Packaging & Mat Technol, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[2] Kasetsart Univ, Postgrad Educ & Res Dev Project Postharvest Techn, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
[3] Natl Sci & Technol Dev Agcy, Natl Met & Mat Technol Ctr, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
[4] Naresuan Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
[5] Michigan State Univ, Sch Packaging, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
bagging; wavelength; mango; growth; harvest; quality; fruit; CALCIUM LEVELS; FRUIT-QUALITY; TEMPERATURE; GROWTH; OXYGEN; YIELD; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.4231
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Preharvest bagging has been shown to improve development and quality of fruits. Different light transmittance bags showed different effects on fruit quality. This study presents the benefits of using newly developed plastic bagging materials with different wavelength-selective characteristics for mangoes (cv. Nam Dok Mai #4). Mangoes were bagged at 45 days after full bloom (DAFB) and randomly harvested at 65, 75, 85, 95, and 105 DAFB. The bags were removed on the harvest days. The wavelength-selective bags (no pigment, yellow, red, blue/violet, blue) were compared with the Kraft paper bag with black paper liner, which is currently used commercially for several fruits, and with non-bagging as a control. RESULTS: Bagging significantly (p <= 0.05) reduced diseases and blemishes. Mango weight at 95 DAFB was increased approximately 15% by VM and V plastic bagging, as compared to paper bagging and control. Plastic bagging accelerated mango ripening as well as growth. Plastic-bagged mangoes reached maturity stage at 95 DAFB, while non-bagged mangoes reached maturity stage at 105 DAFB. Paper bagging resulted in a pale-yellow peel beginning at 65 DAFB, while plastic bagging improved peel glossiness. CONCLUSION: Preharvest bagging with different wavelength-selective materials affected mango development and quality. Bagging mangoes with VM and V materials could reduce peel defects and diseases, increase weight, size, and sphericity, improve peel appearance, and shorten the development periods of mangoes. The results suggest a favorable practice using the newly developed VM and V plastic bags in the production of mangoes, and possibly other fruits as well. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 671
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Influence of fruit bagging on aroma volatiles and skin coloration of 'Hakuho' peach (Prunus persica Batsch) [J].
Jia, HJ ;
Araki, A ;
Okamoto, G .
POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 35 (01) :61-68
[12]   DELAYED HARVESTING OF BANANAS WITH SEALED COVERS ON BUNCHES .2. EFFECT ON FRUIT YIELD AND QUALITY [J].
JOHNS, GG ;
SCOTT, KJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1989, 29 (05) :727-733
[13]   Effect of preharvest bagging on fruit calcium levels, and storage and ripening characteristics of 'Sensation' mangoes [J].
Joyce, DC ;
Beasley, DR ;
Shorter, AJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1997, 37 (03) :383-389
[14]  
KASANTIKUL D, 1984, KASETSART J NAT SCI, V8, P55
[15]   SEASONAL PATTERNS OF CARBOHYDRATES AND PROLINE IN JOJOBA CLONES THAT DIFFER IN FROST SUSCEPTIBILITY [J].
KHALAFALLA, MS ;
PALZKILL, DA .
HORTSCIENCE, 1990, 25 (01) :103-105
[16]  
Kitagawa H., 1992, Acta Horticulturae, V2, P871
[17]   Manipulation of ethylene synthesis and perception in plants: The ins and the outs [J].
Klee, HJ ;
Clark, DG .
HORTSCIENCE, 2002, 37 (03) :450-452
[18]  
Léchaudel Mathieu, 2007, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., V19, P287, DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202007000400004
[19]  
Lizada M.C., 1991, ACTA HORTIC, V291, P437, DOI DOI 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.1991.291.50
[20]   Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control [J].
Noctor, G ;
Foyer, CH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 49 :249-279