Typing Speed as a Confounding Variable and the Measurement of Quality in Divergent Thinking

被引:70
作者
Forthmann, Boris [1 ]
Holling, Heinz [1 ]
Celik, Pinar [2 ]
Storme, Martin [2 ]
Lubart, Todd [2 ]
机构
[1] Westfal Wilhelms Univ Munster, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Paris 05, Paris, France
关键词
ORIGINAL THINKING; R PACKAGE; CREATIVITY; FLUENCY; TESTS; LOQUACITY;
D O I
10.1080/10400419.2017.1360059
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The need to control for writing or typing speed when assessing divergent-thinking performance has been recognized since the early 90s. An even longer tradition in divergent-thinking research has the issue of scoring the responses for quality. This research addressed both issues within structural equation modeling. Three dimensions of originalityuncommonness, remoteness, and clevernesswere used to derive an overall quality score. Mixed evidence was found in Study 1 for the direct effect of typing speed on fluency. In addition, indirect effects of typing speed via cognitive complexity on overall quality of ideas were uncovered but marginal in both Study 1 and Study 2. This indirect effect was also found for cleverness in Study 2. Another indirect effects of typing speed via fluency was found for cleverness and uncommonness. These findings indicate that controlling for typing speed is important in online divergent-thinking assessment. The inter-relations of various quality scores pertaining to the dimensions of uncommonness, remoteness, and cleverness were promising in terms of convergent validity. Important problems with respect to these scores were identified and discussed to guide future attempts to measure quality in DT.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 269
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AM STAT, DOI DOI 10.2307/2685386
[4]   IS CONSTRUCT DIFFERENTIATION LOQUACITY - A MOTIVATIONAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
BEATTY, MJ ;
PAYNE, SK .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1985, 11 (04) :605-612
[5]  
Burleson B.R., 1987, Communication Quarterly, V35, P317, DOI 10.1080/01463378709369697
[6]   IS COGNITIVE-COMPLEXITY LOQUACITY - A REPLY [J].
BURLESON, BR ;
APPLEGATE, JL ;
NEUWIRTH, CM .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1981, 7 (03) :212-225
[7]  
Carroll J.B., 1993, Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CB09780511571312, 10.1017/CB09780511571312]
[8]   RELATIONS OF CREATIVE RESPONSES TO WORKING TIME AND INSTRUCTIONS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, PR ;
GUILFORD, JP ;
WILSON, RC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 53 (02) :82-88
[9]   Understanding Fluency and Originality: A latent variable perspective [J].
Dumas, Denis ;
Dunbar, Kevin N. .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2014, 14 :56-67
[10]  
Ekstrom R.B., 1976, Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors