Long-term Outcomes of Pediatric Living Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Shingina, Alexandra [1 ]
Vutien, Philip [2 ]
Uleryk, Elizabeth [3 ]
Shah, Prakesh S. [4 ]
Renner, Eberhard [5 ]
Bhat, Mamatha [6 ]
Tinmouth, Jill [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Kim, Joseph [9 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Fac Med, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, 1301 Med Ctr Dr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] EM Uleryk Consulting, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Manitoba, Fac Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Toronto Gen Hosp, Multiorgan Transplant, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
BILIARY ATRESIA; ALLOGRAFT TYPE; SURVIVAL; ADULT; DONATION; IMPACT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/lt.26250
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) emerged in the 1980s as a viable alternative to scarce cadaveric organs for pediatric patients. However, pediatric waitlist mortality remains high. Long-term outcomes of living and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) are inconsistently described in the literature. Our aim was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of LDLT after 1 year of transplantation among pediatric patients with all causes of liver failure. We searched the MEDLINE, Medline-in-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Embase + Embase Classic (OvidSP), and Cochrane (Wiley) from February 1, 1947 to February 26, 2020, without language restrictions. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival beyond 1 year following transplantation. A meta-analysis of unadjusted and adjusted odds and hazard ratios was performed using a random-effects model. A total of 24 studies with 3677 patients who underwent LDLT and 9098 patients who underwent DDLT were included for analysis. In patients with chronic or combined chronic liver failure and acute liver failure (ALF), 1-year (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.88), 3-year (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.89), 5-year (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.89), and 10-year (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-1.00) patient and 1-year (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.70), 3-year (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83), 5-year (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.32-0.76), and 10-year (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49) graft survival were consistently better in LDLT recipients compared with those in DDLT recipients. In patients with ALF, no difference was seen between the 2 groups except for 5-year patient survival (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95), which favored LDLT. Sensitivity analysis by era showed improved survival in the most recent cohort of patients, consistent with the well-described learning curve for the LDLT technique. LDLT provides superior patient and graft survival outcomes relative to DDLT in pediatric patients with chronic liver failure and ALF. More resources may be needed to develop infrastructures and health care systems to support living liver donation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 453
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Survival among pediatric liver transplant recipients: Impact of segmental grafts [J].
Abt, PL ;
Rapaport-Kelz, R ;
Desai, NM ;
Frank, A ;
Sonnad, S ;
Rand, E ;
Markmann, JF ;
Shaked, A ;
Olthoff, KM .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (10) :1287-1293
[2]   Effects of Recipient Size and Allograft Type on Pediatric Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia [J].
Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P. ;
Nekrasov, Victor ;
Cao, Shu ;
Groshen, Susan ;
Kaur, Navpreet ;
Genyk, Yuri S. ;
Matsuoka, Lea .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (02) :221-233
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PLOS MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SCREENING DATA EXTRA
[5]   Pediatric acute liver failure in Brazil: Is living donor liver transplantation the best choice for treatment? [J].
Aoun Tannuri, Ana Cristina ;
Porta, Gilda ;
Miura, Irene Kazue ;
Santos, Maria Merces ;
Rangel Moreira, Daniel de Albuquerque ;
Avila de Rezende, Nathassia Mancebo ;
Miyatani, Helena Thie ;
Tannuri, Uenis .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 22 (07) :1006-1013
[6]   Survival after pediatric liver-transplantation - Why does living donation offer an advantage? [J].
Austin, MT ;
Feurer, ID ;
Chavi, RS ;
Gorden, DL ;
Wright, JK ;
Pinson, CW .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2005, 140 (05) :465-470
[7]   Outcome of pediatric liver transplant recipients in Turkey: Single center experience [J].
Aydogdu, S ;
Arikan, C ;
Kilic, M ;
Ozgenc, F ;
Akman, S ;
Unal, F ;
Yagci, RV ;
Tokat, Y .
PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 9 (06) :723-728
[8]   Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation [J].
Barbetta, Arianna ;
Aljehani, Mayada ;
Kim, Michelle ;
Tien, Christine ;
Ahearn, Aaron ;
Schilperoort, Hannah ;
Sher, Linda ;
Emamaullee, Juliet .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (07) :2399-2412
[9]   Orthotopic liver transplantation for biliary atresia: The US experience [J].
Barshes, NR ;
Lee, TC ;
Balkrishnan, R ;
Karpen, SJ ;
Carter, BA ;
Goss, JA .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (10) :1193-1200
[10]   Analysis of recent pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation outcomes indicates that allograft type is no longer a predictor of survivals [J].
Becker, Natasha S. ;
Barshes, Neal R. ;
Aloia, Thomas A. ;
Nguyen, Tuan ;
Rojo, Javier ;
Rodriguez, Joel A. ;
O'Mahony, Christine A. ;
Karpen, Saul J. ;
Goss, John A. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (08) :1125-1132