Recalibration of the CHAMP satellite magnetic field measurements

被引:19
作者
Yin, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Luehr, Hermann [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Space Phys, Coll Elect Informat, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
magnetic field measurements; magnetometer; calibration; satellite; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1088/0957-0233/22/5/055101
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The eight years of continuous CHAMP operation allows us to investigate the long-term behaviour of the vector magnetometer on board the satellite. For the processing of the FGM vector magnetometer data primarily nine instrument parameters are needed (three offsets, three scale factors and three misalignment angles). These are determined in pre-flight calibration and routinely in the in-flight scalar calibration. A review of the temporal evolution shows that the scale factors exhibit a clear change with time. This variation of the sensitivity can be well described by a logarithmic function. The offsets and the misalignment angles show no long-term trend. The Z component offset performs medium-term variations within the range of 1 nT. These have been corrected on a daily basis. When processing the FGM data over the whole period with the derived parameters, the difference between the FGM and OVM readings stays below 0.5 nT (corresponding to about 0.2 nT standard deviation). For a further improvement the error model has to be extended beyond the scalar calibration. Dynamic spacecraft magnetic fields varying over an orbit are falsely interpreted by the scalar calibration and cause apparent variations of the instrument parameters. In the case of CHAMP, the magnetic field generated by the power system is responsible for most of the remaining errors. We have applied an extended error model that can account for the time-varying disturbance fields. When considering them properly the standard deviation of scalar errors less than 0.1 nT can be achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   In-flight calibration of the NEAR magnetometer [J].
Anderson, BJ ;
Zanetti, LJ ;
Lohr, DH ;
Hayes, JR ;
Acuña, MH ;
Russell, CT ;
Mulligan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (05) :907-917
[2]   Calibration techniques for magnetometers implementing on-board de-spinning algorithms [J].
Brown, P. ;
Dunlop, M. W. ;
Balogh, A. ;
Carr, C. ;
Gloag, J. ;
Lucek, E. ;
Oddy, T. .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2008, 41 (10) :1571-1578
[3]   Accurate determination of magnetic field gradients from four point vector measurements .1. Use of natural constraints on vector data obtained from a single spinning spacecraft [J].
Kepko, EL ;
Khurana, KK ;
Kivelson, MG ;
Elphic, RC ;
Russell, CT .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (02) :377-385
[4]  
KIM YV, 2003, ICCA 03 P 4 INT C MO, P947
[5]   THE MAGSAT MISSION [J].
LANGEL, R ;
OUSLEY, G ;
BERBERT, J ;
MURPHY, J ;
SETTLE, M .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1982, 9 (04) :243-245
[6]  
LANGEL RA, 1997, CALIBRATION NON ABSO
[7]   An advanced approach to finding magnetometer zero levels in the interplanetary magnetic field [J].
Leinweber, H. K. ;
Russell, C. T. ;
Torkar, K. ;
Zhang, T. L. ;
Angelopoulos, V. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 19 (05)
[8]   Triaxial fluxgate gradiometer of high stability and linearity [J].
Merayo, JMG ;
Brauer, P ;
Primdahl, F .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2005, 120 (01) :71-77
[9]   Scalar calibration of vector magnetometers [J].
Merayo, JMG ;
Brauer, P ;
Primdahl, F ;
Petersen, JR ;
Nielsen, OV .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 11 (02) :120-132
[10]   The orthogonalization of magnetic systems [J].
Merayo, JMG ;
Primdahl, F ;
Brauer, P ;
Risbo, T ;
Olsen, N ;
Sabaka, T .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2001, 89 (03) :185-196