Disgorgement of Profits in Canada

被引:1
作者
Smith, Lionel [1 ,2 ]
Berryman, Jeff [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, 3690 Rue Peel, Montreal, PQ H3A 1W9, Canada
[2] Kings Coll London, Dickson Poon Sch Law, Private Law, London, England
[3] Univ Windsor, Fac Law, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[4] Univ Auckland, Fac Law, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
DISGORGEMENT OF PROFITS: GAIN-BASED REMEDIES THROUGHOUT THE WORLD | 2015年 / 8卷
关键词
Disgorgement; Restitution; Remedies; Fiduciary duties; Confidential information; Breach of contract; Intellectual property; Tort;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-18759-4_16
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Canadian law sometimes allows gain-based remedies for certain wrongful acts. There is a strong suggestion that gain-based remedies are available in the common law provinces for torts and perhaps breaches of contract, but the courts have been hesitant. Common law provinces have also been willing to award gain-based remedies for breaches of confidence, in the court's discretion. In the context of infringements of intellectual property rights, which is federal law, the legislation makes clear that gain-based remedies are available, although again this is in the discretion of the court. In both common law and Quebec civil law, in situations where one person is managing the property or affairs of another in a fiduciary capacity, improper gains must be surrendered, although it is arguable that the law ascribes rights acquired by the manager to the principal as the correct legal implementation of the parties' relationship, rather than as a remedy for wrongdoing.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 297
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Berryman J., 2009, NZ BUSINESS LAW J, V15, P35
  • [2] Bibliography Berryman J., 1994, CANADIAN BAR REV, V73, P320
  • [3] Cantin Cumyn M., 2007, MCGILL LAW J, V52, P209
  • [4] Cantin Cumyn M, 2009, EUROPEAN REV PRIVATE, V17
  • [5] CUMYN M., 2013, CONFLITS INTERETS, P49
  • [6] Cumyn Madeleine Cantin, 2014, ADM BIEN AUTRUI
  • [7] Edelman J, 2002, GAIN BASED DAMAGES
  • [8] Hughes R.T., 2005, HUGHES WOODLEY PATEN
  • [9] Maddaugh Peter, 2004, LAW RESTITUTION
  • [10] McCamus John D., 2003, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, V36, p.p, P943