Flipped pedagogy and student evaluations of teaching

被引:13
|
作者
Samuel, Michelle L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt St Marys Univ, Dept Psychol, 12001 Chalon Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90049 USA
关键词
flipped classroom; higher education; pedagogical technique; student evaluations of teaching; HIGHER-EDUCATION; CLASSROOM; PERFORMANCE; RATINGS; CHALLENGES; QUALITY; FACULTY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1177/1469787419855188
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A common concern of faculty members is student evaluations of teaching scores. Many factors influence student evaluations of teaching including how the course is designed. This study investigated student evaluations of teaching across three pedagogical techniques: the traditional lecture (where lectures were not recorded), recorded lectures, and a flipped classroom model. A between-subject design was used over three semesters. Student evaluations of teaching showed that students rated the instructor significantly higher in a flipped classroom setting. Students also reported liking the course more using the flipped pedagogical technique. Since the flipped format improved both teaching evaluations and student perceptions of the class, this could be useful for instructors when they are deciding how to set up the format of their class.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Student evaluations of teaching: the impact of faculty procedures on response rates
    Young, Karen
    Joines, Jeffrey
    Standish, Trey
    Gallagher, Victoria
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [22] How student evaluations of teaching contribute to hindrance of faculty diversity?
    Santisteban, Lisette
    Egues, Aida L.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2022, 17 (04) : 455 - 459
  • [23] The Multidimensional Nature of Teaching and Student Evaluations: Commentary on Students' Judgements of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness
    Boysen, Guy A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2020, 9 (02) : 152 - 156
  • [24] Including the Student Voice: Experiences and Learning Outcomes of a Flipped Communication Course
    Kantanen, Helena
    Koponen, Jonna
    Sointu, Erkko
    Valtonen, Teemu
    BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2019, 82 (03) : 337 - 356
  • [25] How Faculty Status Impacts Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Study of Full- Versus Part-Time Marketing Faculty
    Tashchian, Armen
    Kalamas Hedden, Maria
    Forrester, William R.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING EDUCATION, 2022, 44 (01) : 113 - 126
  • [26] Why bother? Student motivation to participate in student evaluations of teaching
    Hoel, Anniken
    Dahl, Tove Irene
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (03) : 361 - 378
  • [27] STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING AND INTERNAL QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY
    Jeftic, Alma
    Joksimovic, Jelena
    ICERI2015: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2015, : 2110 - 2115
  • [28] Teaching Evaluations and Student Grades: That's Not Fair!
    Lilly, Juliana D.
    Wipawayangkool, Kamphol
    Pass, Michael
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2022, 46 (06) : 994 - 1023
  • [29] "He just teaches whatever he thinks is important": Analysis of comments in student evaluations of teaching
    Padgett, Stephen M.
    NURSING INQUIRY, 2021, 28 (03)
  • [30] Teaching Evaluations and Student Grades: That's Not Fair!
    Lilly, Juliana D.
    Wipawayangkool, Kamphol
    Pass, Michael
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2022,