Couples who get closer after breast cancer:: Frequency and predictors in a prospective investigation

被引:99
作者
Dorval, M
Guay, S
Mondor, M
Mâsse, B
Falardeau, M
Robidoux, A
Deschênes, L
Maunsell, E
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Ctr Hosp Affile Univ Quebec, Ctr Rech, Unite Rech Sante Populat, Laval, PQ, Canada
[2] Hop St Sacrement, Ctr Maladies Sein Deschenes Fabia, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.01.628
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Although some couples report an improved relationship since coping with breast cancer together, little quantitative information exists about this phenomenon. We assessed extent to which both couple members report that breast cancer brought them closer and characteristics that predicted this. Patients and Methods This prospective study was based on all women with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic disease first treated during recruitment in four Quebec hospitals, in addition to their spouses. Participation was 87% among eligible patients and 91% among spouses of participating patients. Both couple partners were interviewed individually about quality of life at 2 weeks and 3 and 12 months after treatment start. At 12 months, each was asked whether the disease had brought them closer, distanced them, or had no effect. Results Overall, 42% of the 282 couples said breast cancer brought them closer, 6% had one or other partner reporting feeling distanced, and less than 1% of couples had both partners reporting feeling distanced. Characteristics assessed explained 31% of variance in the proportion of couples getting closer (P < .0001). After taking into account partners' prediagnosis characteristics and the woman's treatment, the spouse reporting the patient as confidant (P=.003), getting advice from her in the first 2 weeks about coping with breast cancer (P=.03), accompanying her to surgery (P=.057), the patient's reporting more affection from her spouse at 3 months since diagnosis (P=.003) predicted both partners saying the disease brought them closer. Conclusion Breast cancer can be a growth experience for couples under certain conditions. This information may help reassure patients and their spouses confronting this disease. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3588 / 3596
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]  
NORTHOUSE LL, 1988, NURS RES, V37, P91
[42]   PSYCHOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENT AMONG HUSBANDS OF WOMEN TREATED FOR BREAST-CANCER - MASTECTOMY VS BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY [J].
OMNEPONTEN, M ;
HOLMBERG, L ;
BERGSTROM, R ;
SJODEN, PO ;
BURNS, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (10) :1393-1397
[43]   THE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO BREAST-CANCER [J].
PISTRANG, N ;
BARKER, C .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 40 (06) :789-797
[44]   Social support in spouses of cancer patients: What do they get and to what end? [J].
Ptacek, JT ;
Pierce, GR ;
Dodge, KL ;
Ptacek, JJ .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1997, 4 (04) :431-449
[45]   Myth-busters: Telling the true story of breast cancer survivorship [J].
Schover, LR .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (24) :1800-1801
[46]   METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND RESEARCH STRATEGIES IN THE STUDY OF COPING WITH CANCER [J].
SOMERFIELD, M ;
CURBOW, B .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1992, 34 (11) :1203-1216
[47]   MEASURING DYADIC ADJUSTMENT - NEW SCALES FOR ASSESSING QUALITY OF MARRIAGE AND SIMILAR DYADS [J].
SPANIER, GB .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1976, 38 (01) :15-28
[48]   FAMILY COPING STRATEGIES AND CHRONIC ILLNESS IN THE MOTHER [J].
STETZ, KM ;
LEWIS, FM ;
PRIMOMO, J .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 1986, 35 (04) :515-522
[49]   Partner abandonment of women with breast cancer -: Myth or reality? [J].
Taylor-Brown, J ;
Kilpatrick, M ;
Maunsell, E ;
Dorval, M .
CANCER PRACTICE, 2000, 8 (04) :160-164
[50]   'Powerful/powerless' language in court: A critical re-evaluation of the Duke Language and Law Programme [J].
Thompson, JK .
FORENSIC LINGUISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND THE LAW, 2002, 9 (02) :153-167