Southern Chile crustal structure from teleseismic receiver functions: Responses to ridge subduction and terrane assembly of Patagonia

被引:15
|
作者
Rodriguez, E. E. [1 ]
Russo, R. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Geol Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
GEOSPHERE | 2020年 / 16卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONTINENTAL COLLISION; POISSONS RATIO; BENEATH; MAGMAS; ARC; CONSTRAINTS; OPHIOLITE; TECTONICS; PENINSULA; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1130/GES01692.1
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Continental crustal structure is the product of those processes that operate typically during a long tectonic history. For the Patagonia composite terrane, these tectonic processes include its early Paleozoic accretion to the South America portion of Gondwana, Triassic rifting of Gondwana, and overriding of Pacific Basin oceanic lithosphere since the Mesozoic. To assess the crustal structure and glean insight into how these tectonic processes affected Patagonia, we combined data from two temporary seismic networks situated inboard of the Chile triple junction, with a combined total of 80 broadband seismic stations. Events suitable for analysis yielded 995 teleseismic receiver functions. We estimated crustal thicknesses using two methods, the H-k stacking method and common conversion point stacking. Crustal thicknesses vary between 30 and 55 km. The South American Moho lies at 28-35 km depth in forearc regions that have experienced ridge subduction, in contrast to crustal thicknesses ranging from 34 to 55 km beneath regions north of the Chile triple junction. Inboard, the prevailing Moho depth of similar to 35 km shallows to similar to 30 km along an E-W trend between 46.5 degrees S and 47 degrees S; we relate this structure to Paleozoic thrust emplacement of the Proterozoic Deseado Massif terrane above the thicker crust of the North Patagonian/Somun Cura terrane along a major south-dipping fault.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 391
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crustal structure in the Southern Apennines from teleseismic receiver functions
    Steckler, Michael S.
    Agostinetti, Nicola Piana
    Wilson, Charles K.
    Roselli, Pamela
    Seeber, Leonardo
    Amato, Alessandro
    Lerner-Lam, Arthur
    GEOLOGY, 2008, 36 (02) : 155 - 158
  • [2] The crustal structure of Norway from inversion of teleseismic receiver functions
    Ottemöller, L
    Midzi, V
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2003, 7 (01) : 35 - 48
  • [3] Crustal structure in the Pakistan Himalaya from teleseismic receiver functions
    Li, Aibing
    Mashele, Bongani
    GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2009, 10
  • [4] Crustal structure of southeast Australia from teleseismic receiver functions
    Bello, Mohammed
    Cornwell, David G.
    Rawlinson, Nicholas
    Reading, Anya M.
    Likkason, Othaniel K.
    SOLID EARTH, 2021, 12 (02) : 463 - 481
  • [5] The crustal structure of Norway from inversion of teleseismic receiver functions
    L. Ottemöller
    V. Midzi
    Journal of Seismology, 2003, 7 : 35 - 48
  • [6] Crustal structure of north Peru from analysis of teleseismic receiver functions
    Condori, Cristobal
    Franca, George S.
    Tavera, Hernando J.
    Albuquerque, Diogo F.
    Bishop, Brandon T.
    Beck, Susan L.
    JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 : 11 - 24
  • [7] CRUSTAL STRUCTURE IN EASTERN KAZAKH, USSR FROM TELESEISMIC RECEIVER FUNCTIONS
    PRIESTLEY, KF
    ZANDT, G
    RANDALL, GE
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1988, 15 (06) : 613 - 616
  • [8] Crustal structure beneath the Faroe Islands from teleseismic receiver functions
    Harland, K. E.
    White, R. S.
    Soosalu, H.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 177 (01) : 115 - 124
  • [9] Crustal structure beneath the Indochina peninsula from teleseismic receiver functions
    Bai, Ling
    Tian, Xiaobo
    Ritsema, Jeroen
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 37
  • [10] The crustal structure beneath SE Romania from teleseismic receiver functions
    Diehl, T
    Ritter, JRR
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 163 (01) : 238 - 251