Development and validation of a low-literacy Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease knowledge Questionnaire (COPD-Q)

被引:42
|
作者
Maples, Paula
Franks, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Ray, Shaunta' [1 ,2 ]
Stevens, Amy Barger [2 ]
Wallace, Lorraine S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Coll Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, 1924 Alcoa Highway,Box 117, Knoxville, TN 37920 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Grad Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Knoxville, TN 37920 USA
关键词
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Patient education; Knowledge questionnaire; CONTENT VALIDITY; HEALTH LITERACY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a content valid, understandable, readable, and reliable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease knowledge Questionnaire (COPD-Q). Methods: Twenty-one questions were generated as potential items to include in the COPD-Q. Twenty-two content experts provided both qualitative and quantitative assessments of two COPD-Q drafts. Ten patient volunteers completed a field test to assess clarity of individual COPD-Q items. An additional 24 patient volunteers completed a pilot test to determine internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the COPD-Q. The Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) was used to assess reading grade level of the COPD-Q. Results: Thirteen items were rated as "essential" (content validity ratio = p < 0.05) by content experts and composed the final COPD-Q. Internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha, was 0.72. Test-retest reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.90. The FRE score of the COPD-Q was 74.7 (equivalent to a 5th grade reading level). Conclusion: The COPD-Q is a valid, readable and reliable knowledge assessment instrument for assessing COPD knowledge in patients who may have low health literacy skills. Practice implications: Health care providers can use the COPD-Q to tailor counseling efforts according to individual patient needs, and to assess the effectiveness of their educational interventions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 22
页数:4
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据