Patients' and Cardiologists' Perceptions of the Benefits of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Disease

被引:137
作者
Rothberg, Michael B. [1 ]
Sivalingam, Senthil K.
Ashraf, Javed
Visintainer, Paul
Joelson, John
Kleppel, Reva
Vallurupalli, Neelima
Schweiger, Marc J.
机构
[1] Baystate Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gen Med & Geriatr, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
关键词
OPTIMAL MEDICAL THERAPY; ARTERY-DISEASE; AD-HOC; INFORMED-CONSENT; ANGIOPLASTY; SURGERY; RISKS; TRIAL; REVASCULARIZATION; PCI;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: It is unclear whether patients understand that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces only chronic stable angina and not myocardial infarction (MI) or associated mortality. Objective: To compare cardiologists' and patients' beliefs about PCI. Design: Survey. Setting: Academic center. Participants: 153 patients who consented to elective coronary catheterization and possible PCI, 10 interventional cardiologists, and 17 referring cardiologists. Measurements: Patients' and cardiologists' beliefs about benefits of PCI. All cardiologists reported beliefs about PCI for patients in hypothetical scenarios. Interventional cardiologists also reported beliefs for study patients who underwent PCI. Results: Of 153 patients, 68% had any angina, 42% had activity-limiting angina, 77% had a positive stress test result, and 29% had had previous MI. The 53 patients who underwent PCI were more likely than those who did not to have a positive stress test result, but angina was similar in both groups. Almost three quarters of patients thought that without PCI, they would probably have MI within 5 years, and 88% believed that PCI would reduce risk for MI. Patients were more likely than physicians to believe that PCI would prevent MI (prevalence ratio, 4.25 [95% CI, 2.31 to 7.79]) or fatal MI (prevalence ratio, 4.83 [CI, 2.23 to 10.46]). Patients were less likely than their physicians to report pre-PCI angina (prevalence ratio, 0.79 [CI, 0.67 to 0.92]). For the scenarios, 63% of cardiologists believed that the benefits of PCI were limited to symptom relief. Of cardiologists who identified no benefit of PCI in 2 scenarios, 43% indicated that they would still proceed with PCI in these cases. Limitation: The study was small and conducted at 1 center, and information about precatheterization counseling was limited. Conclusion: Cardiologists' beliefs about PCI reflect trial results, but patients' beliefs do not. Discussions with patients before PCI should better explain anticipated benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / U55
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
[2]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[3]   Converting the Informed Consent From a Perfunctory Process to an Evidence-Based Foundation for Patient Decision Making [J].
Arnold, Suzanne V. ;
Decker, Carole ;
Ahmad, Homaa ;
Olabiyi, Olawale ;
Mundluru, Surya ;
Reid, Kimberly J. ;
Soto, Gabriel E. ;
Gansert, Sarah ;
Spertus, John A. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2008, 1 (01) :21-28
[4]  
Blankenship JC, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V49, P130, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200002)49:2<130::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-T
[6]   Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease [J].
Boden, William E. ;
O'Rourke, Robert A. ;
Teo, Koon K. ;
Hartigan, Pamela M. ;
Maron, David J. ;
Kostuk, William J. ;
Knudtson, Merril ;
Dada, Marcin ;
Casperson, Paul ;
Harris, Crystal L. ;
Chaitman, Bernard R. ;
Shaw, Leslee ;
Gosselin, Gilbert ;
Nawaz, Shah ;
Title, Lawrence M. ;
Gau, Gerald ;
Blaustein, Alvin S. ;
Booth, David C. ;
Bates, Eric R. ;
Spertus, John A. ;
Berman, Daniel S. ;
Mancini, G. B. John ;
Weintraub, William S. ;
Boden, W. ;
O'Rourke, R. ;
Teo, K. ;
Hartigan, P. ;
Weintraub, W. ;
Maron, D. ;
Mancini, J. ;
Weintraub, W. ;
Boden, W. ;
O'Rourke, R. ;
Teo, K. ;
Hartigan, P. ;
Knudtson, M. ;
Maron, D. ;
Bates, E. ;
Blaustein, A. ;
Booth, D. ;
Carere, R. ;
Ellis, S. ;
Gosselin, G. ;
Gau, G. ;
Jacobs, A. ;
King, S., III ;
Kostuk, W. ;
Harris, C. ;
Spertus, J. ;
Peduzzi, P. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (15) :1503-1516
[7]   Outcomes following immediate (Ad hoc) versus staged percutaneous coronary interventions (Report from the 2000 to 2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry) [J].
Feldman, Dmitriy N. ;
Minutello, Robert m ;
Gade, Christopher L. ;
Wong, S. Chiu .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (04) :446-449
[8]   A COMPARISON OF IMMEDIATE ANGIOPLASTY WITH THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
GRINES, CL ;
BROWNE, KF ;
MARCO, J ;
ROTHBAUM, D ;
STONE, GW ;
OKEEFE, J ;
OVERLIE, P ;
DONOHUE, B ;
CHELLIAH, N ;
TIMMIS, GC ;
VLIETSTRA, RE ;
STRZELECKI, M ;
PUCHROWICZOCHOCKI, S ;
ONEILL, WW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (10) :673-679
[9]   How do patients perceive the benefits and risks of peripheral angioplasty? Implications for informed consent [J].
Habib, Said B. ;
Sonoda, Luke ;
See, Teik C. ;
Ell, Peter J. ;
Groves, Ashley M. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (02) :177-181
[10]   Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization [J].
Holmboe, ES ;
Fiellin, DA ;
Cusanelli, E ;
Remetz, M ;
Krumholz, HM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (09) :632-637