Readout-segmented Echo-pIanar Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted MR Breast Examinations at 3.0 T

被引:181
作者
Bogner, Wolfgang [1 ]
Pinker-Domenig, Katja [2 ]
Bickel, Hubert [2 ]
Chmelik, Marek [1 ]
Weber, Michael
Helbich, Thomas H. [2 ]
Trattnig, Siegfried [1 ]
Gruber, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol, MR Ctr Excellence, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol, Div Mol & Gender Imaging, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; HIGH-RISK; ADC MAP; CANCER; LESIONS; COEFFICIENT; BENIGN; EPI; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.12111494
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging based on standard single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in patients with breast cancer at 3.0 T. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-seven patients with 49 histopathologically verified lesions were included in this study. In all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters, was performed with a 3.0-T MR imager. Two independent readers visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, geometric distortions) were quantified. Regions of interest were drawn in all lesions (28 malignant, 21 benign) and in the normal breast parenchyma to investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on the basis of an ADC threshold of 1.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. Results: Each reader found a higher diagnostic accuracy for readout-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging. The area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger than for single-shot echo-planar imaging (0.867) (P = .026). There was no significant difference in the ADC obtained by using either DW imaging method. Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (P < .001). Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced geometric distortions by a factor of three. Conclusion: DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, image blurring, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager. Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. (C) RSNA, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 76
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI [J].
Partridge, SC ;
McKinnon, GC ;
Henry, RG ;
Hylton, NM .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 14 (04) :433-438
[32]  
Petralia G, 2011, RADIOL MED, V116, P466, DOI 10.1007/s11547-011-0616-z
[33]   Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer [J].
Pickles, Martin D. ;
Gibbs, Peter ;
Lowry, Martin ;
Turnbull, Lindsay W. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (07) :843-847
[34]   A Combined High Temporal and High Spatial Resolution 3 Tesla MR Imaging Protocol for the Assessment of Breast Lesions Initial Results [J].
Pinker, Katja ;
Grabner, Gunther ;
Bogner, Wolfgang ;
Gruber, Stephan ;
Szomolanyi, Pavol ;
Trattnig, Siegfried ;
Heinz-Peer, Gertraud ;
Weber, Michael ;
Fitzal, Florian ;
Pluschnig, Ursula ;
Rudas, Margarethe ;
Helbich, Thomas .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (09) :553-558
[35]   High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADSA® descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer? [J].
Pinker-Domenig, K. ;
Bogner, W. ;
Gruber, S. ;
Bickel, H. ;
Duffy, S. ;
Schernthaner, M. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Pluschnig, U. ;
Rudas, M. ;
Trattnig, S. ;
Helbich, T. H. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) :322-330
[36]  
Porter D., 2004, P INT SOC MAGNETIC R, V12, P442
[37]  
Porter DA, 1999, MAGN RESON MED, V42, P385, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199908)42:2<385::AID-MRM21>3.0.CO
[38]  
2-J
[39]   High Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging, Parallel Imaging and a Two-Dimensional Navigator-Based Reacquisition [J].
Porter, David A. ;
Heidemann, Robin M. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) :468-475
[40]   Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL [J].
Rakow-Penner, R ;
Daniel, B ;
Yu, HZ ;
Sawyer-Glover, A ;
Glover, GH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (01) :87-91