Optimal Force-Based Beam-Column Element Size for Reinforced-Concrete Piles in Bridges

被引:31
作者
He, Zhongying [1 ]
Liu, Weian [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Xiaowei [2 ]
Ye, Aijun [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Kaifeng 475004, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] HSA & Associates, 16700 Valley View Ave,Suite 220, La Mirada, CA 90638 USA
[4] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc SGH, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reinforced-concrete pile; Numerical modeling; Force-based beam-column element; Integration point; Bridge foundation; NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; R/C FRAMES; MODEL; EXCITATION; DUCTILITY; BEHAVIOR; SHAFTS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000926
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The nonobjective disadvantages of the force-based frame element, such as the nonobjective curvature prediction, have been discussed by many researchers. The trial-and-error method is commonly used to determine element size, but it could cost tremendous computational efforts. This paper proposes and analytically studies the optimal element size for reinforced-concrete piles for bridges when using force-based beam elements. In this study, the relationship between the optimum element size and integration point number is investigated, and the equivalent plastic hinge length is used and correlated to the optimal element size, on the basis of which the moment-curvature and force-displacement responses are objective and the soil effects on the pile response could be simulated sufficiently as required. The results of a case study show that both the local and global responses can be very well predicted, and the nonobjective disadvantage of the force-based element could be eliminated using the proposed optimal element size. Additionally, the optimal element size with more than two integration points is suggested for modeling the plastic hinge in the pile above the ground.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AASHTO, 2007, AASHTO GUID SPEC LRF
[2]   Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses [J].
Boulanger, RW ;
Curras, CJ ;
Kutter, BL ;
Wilson, DW ;
Abghari, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (09) :750-759
[3]  
Brown J., 2000, 000007 MCEER STAT U
[4]   Flexural strength and ductility of extended pile-shafts. I: Analytical model [J].
Chai, YH .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2002, 128 (05) :586-594
[5]   Flexural strength and ductility of extended pile-shafts. II: Experimental study [J].
Chai, YH ;
Hutchinson, TC .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2002, 128 (05) :595-602
[6]   Localization issues in force-based frame elements [J].
Coleman, J ;
Spacone, E .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2001, 127 (11) :1257-1265
[7]  
Correial A. A., 2008, P 14 WORLD C EARTHQ
[8]   Nonlinear cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bars including buckling [J].
Gomes, A ;
Appleton, J .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1997, 19 (10) :822-826
[9]  
He L., 1992, SEISMIC BEHAV FLANGE
[10]  
Hellesland J., 1981, Analysis of RC Bridge Columns Under Imposed Deformations, P545