The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups

被引:243
作者
Mastrandrea, Michael D. [1 ]
Mach, Katharine J. [1 ]
Plattner, Gian-Kasper [2 ,3 ]
Edenhofer, Ottmar [4 ,5 ]
Stocker, Thomas F. [3 ,6 ]
Field, Christopher B.
Ebi, Kristie L. [1 ]
Matschoss, Patrick R.
机构
[1] Carnegie Inst Sci, IPCC Working Grp Tech Support Unit 2, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Bern, IPCC Working Grp Tech Support Unit 1, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Phys, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Berlin, Fac Planning Bldg Dept, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[6] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Guidance Note; Author Team; Third Assessment Report; Climate Outcome; Uncertainty Guidance;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evaluation and communication of the relative degree of certainty in assessment findings are key cross-cutting issues for the three Working Groups of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A goal for the Fifth Assessment Report, which is currently under development, is the application of a common framework with associated calibrated uncertainty language that can be used to characterize findings of the assessment process. A guidance note for authors of the Fifth Assessment Report has been developed that describes this common approach and language, building upon the guidance employed in past Assessment Reports. Here, we introduce the main features of this guidance note, with a focus on how it has been designed for use by author teams. We also provide perspectives on considerations and challenges relevant to the application of this guidance in the contribution of each Working Group to the Fifth Assessment Report. Despite the wide spectrum of disciplines encompassed by the three Working Groups, we expect that the framework of the new uncertainties guidance will enable consistent communication of the degree of certainty in their policy-relevant assessment findings.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 691
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DEV NEW SCENARIOS CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CIRED working papers hal-00866437
[4]  
[Anonymous], 5 IPCC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IPCC WORKSH DESCR SC
[6]   International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios [J].
Clarke, Leon ;
Edmonds, Jae ;
Krey, Volker ;
Richels, Richard ;
Rose, Steven ;
Tavoni, Massimo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 :S64-S81
[7]  
Edenhofer O, 2006, ENERGY J, V93, P57
[8]  
Edenhofer O., 2009, The Economics of Decarbonization. Report of the RECIPE project, Potsdam-Institute for Climate Impact Research
[9]  
Edenhofer O, 2010, ENERG J, V31
[10]   Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality [J].
Harmsen, Mathijs J. H. M. ;
van Dorst, Pim ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. ;
van den Berg, Maarten ;
Van Dingenen, Rita ;
Klimont, Zbigniew .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) :1519-1538