Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production

被引:263
作者
Angelsen, Arild [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Econ & Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
climate; Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation; tropical forests; protected areas; yield; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; LABOR-MARKETS; COVER CHANGE; LAND-USE; FORCES; YIELD; PARKS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0912014107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Policies to effectively reduce deforestation are discussed within a land rent (von Thunen) framework. The first set of policies attempts to reduce the rent of extensive agriculture, either by neglecting extension, marketing, and infrastructure, generating alternative income opportunities, stimulating intensive agricultural production or by reforming land tenure. The second set aims to increase either extractive or protective forest rent and-more-importantly-create institutions (community forest management) or markets (payment for environmental services) that enable land users to capture a larger share of the protective forest rent. The third set aims to limit forest conversion directly by establishing protected areas. Many of these policy options present local win-lose scenarios between forest conservation and agricultural production. Local yield increases tend to stimulate agricultural encroachment, contrary to the logic of the global food equation that suggests yield increases take pressure off forests. At national and global scales, however, policy makers are presented with a more pleasant scenario. Agricultural production in developing countries has increased by 3.3-3.4% annually over the last 2 decades, whereas gross deforestation has increased agricultural area by only 0.3%, suggesting a minor role of forest conversion in overall agricultural production. A spatial delinking of remaining forests and intensive production areas should also help reconcile conservation and production goals in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:19639 / 19644
页数:6
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Agrawal A., 2009, Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, P201, DOI DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/002871
[2]  
[Alexandratos N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)], 1995, WORLD AGR 2010
[3]   Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Alston, LJ ;
Libecap, GD ;
Mueller, B .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 39 (02) :162-188
[4]   Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation [J].
Andam, Kwaw S. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo ;
Robalino, Juan A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (42) :16089-16094
[5]   Agricultural expansion and deforestation: modelling the impact of population, market forces and property rights [J].
Angelsen, A .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1999, 58 (01) :185-218
[6]   Agricultural technology and forests: A recapitulation [J].
Angelsen, A ;
Kaimowitz, D .
AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES AND TROPICAL DEFORESTATION, 2001, :383-402
[7]   Playing games in the forest: State-local conflicts of land appropriation [J].
Angelsen, A .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2001, 77 (02) :285-299
[8]   Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models [J].
Angelsen, A ;
Kaimowitz, D .
WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 1999, 14 (01) :73-98
[9]  
Angelsen A., 2008, MOVING AHEAD REDD IS
[10]  
Angelsen A., 2009, Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options, P1, DOI DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/002871