Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: a qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda

被引:12
作者
Ochieng, Joseph [1 ]
Kwagala, Betty [2 ]
Barugahare, John [3 ]
Mwaka, Erisa [1 ]
Ekusai-Sebatta, Deborah [1 ]
Ali, Joseph [4 ,5 ]
Sewankambo, Nelson K. [6 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Anat, POB 7072, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Makerere Univ, Sch Business & Management Studies, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Makerere Univ, Sch Humanities, Kampala, Uganda
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Makerere Univ, Sch Med, Kampala, Uganda
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Perspectives; Ethical considerations; Return of results; Genetics; Genomics research; Researchers; Uganda; INFORMED-CONSENT; RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; FAMILIES; CHALLENGES; MEMBERS; HEALTH; LEGAL;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-021-00724-1
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The return of genetics and genomics research results has been a subject of ongoing global debate. Such feedback is ethically desirable to update participants on research findings particularly those deemed clinically significant. Although there is limited literature, debate continues in African on what constitutes appropriate practice regarding the return of results for genetics and genomics research. This study explored perspectives and ethical considerations of Ugandan genomics researchers regarding the return of genetics and genomics research results. Methods This was a qualitative study that employed in-depth interviews. Thirty participants were purposively selected based on their expertise as genomics researchers in Uganda. Data were analysed through content analysis along the main themes of the study using a comprehensive thematic matrix, to identify common patterns arising from the narratives. NVivo software 12 was used to support data analysis. Results The return of genetics and genomics research results was generally acceptable to researchers, and some indicated that they had previously returned individual or aggregate results to participants and communities. The main reasons cited for sharing research results with participants included their clinical utility, actionability and overall benefit to society. Ethical considerations for appropriate return of results included a need for effective community engagement, genetic counselling prior to disclosure of the results, adequate informed consent, and proper assessment of the implications of, or consequences of returning of results. However, the approaches to return of results were perceived as unstandardized due to the lack of appropriate regulatory frameworks. Conclusions The return of genetic and genomic research results is generally acceptable to researchers despite the lack of appropriate regulatory frameworks. Ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results are highly divergent, hence the need for national ethical guidelines to appropriately regulate the practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A scoping review of genetics and genomics research ethics policies and guidelines for Africa [J].
Ali, Joseph ;
Cohn, Betty ;
Mwaka, Erisa ;
Bollinger, Juli M. ;
Kwagala, Betty ;
Barugahare, John ;
Sewankambo, Nelson K. ;
Ochieng, Joseph .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 22 (01)
[2]  
[Anonymous], OPHSWORKSHEET 45 CFR
[3]   Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results [J].
Berrios, Courtney ;
James, Cynthia A. ;
Raraigh, Karen ;
Bollinger, Juli ;
Murray, Brittney ;
Tichnell, Crystal ;
Applegate, Carolyn D. ;
Bergner, Amanda L. .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (01) :263-273
[4]   Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters [J].
Beskow, Laura M. ;
Burke, Wylie .
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (38)
[5]   Genetic counselors as social and behavioral scientists in the era of precision medicine [J].
Biesecker, Barbara B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2018, 178 (01) :10-14
[6]   Ethical Legal and Social Issues of Biobanking: Past, Present, and Future [J].
Bledsoe, Marianna J. .
BIOPRESERVATION AND BIOBANKING, 2017, 15 (02) :142-147
[7]   Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study [J].
Bollinger, Juli Murphy ;
Scott, Joan ;
Dvoskin, Rachel ;
Kaufman, David .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :451-457
[8]  
Botkin Jr, 2018, CONSEN STUDY REPORTS, P1, DOI 10.17226/25094
[9]   Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
Kroes, Hester Y. ;
Cuppen, Edwin ;
Parker, Michael ;
van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2011, 27 (02) :41-47
[10]   The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data [J].
Bycroft, Clare ;
Freeman, Colin ;
Petkova, Desislava ;
Band, Gavin ;
Elliott, Lloyd T. ;
Sharp, Kevin ;
Motyer, Allan ;
Vukcevic, Damjan ;
Delaneau, Olivier ;
O'Connell, Jared ;
Cortes, Adrian ;
Welsh, Samantha ;
Young, Alan ;
Effingham, Mark ;
McVean, Gil ;
Leslie, Stephen ;
Allen, Naomi ;
Donnelly, Peter ;
Marchini, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2018, 562 (7726) :203-+