Entitled to Addiction? Pharmaceuticals, Race, and America's First Drug War

被引:16
作者
Herzberg, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo SUNY, Hist, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pharmaceutical history; drug and alcohol history; race; addiction; CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT; EPIDEMIC; LAW;
D O I
10.1353/bhm.2017.0061
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article rethinks the formative decades of American drug wars through a social history of addiction to pharmaceutical narcotics, sedatives, and stimulants in the first half of the twentieth century. It argues, first, that addiction to pharmaceutical drugs is no recent aberration; it has historically been more extensive than "street" or illicit drug use. Second, it argues that access to psychoactive pharmaceuticals was a problematic social entitlement constructed as distinctively medical amid the racialized reforms of the Progressive Era. The resulting drug control regime provided inadequate consumer protection for some (through the FDA), and overly punitive policing for others (through the FBN). Instead of seeing these as two separate stories-one a liberal triumph and the other a repressive scourge-both should be understood as part of the broader establishment of a consumer market for drugs segregated by class and race like other consumer markets developed in the era of Progressivism and Jim Crow.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 623
页数:38
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Acker CarolineJean., 2002, CREATING AM JUNKIE
[2]  
Ahmad DianaL., 2011, OPIUM DEBATE CHINESE
[3]  
Alexander M., 2012, THE NEW JIM CROW
[4]  
Anderson Oscar Edward, 1958, HLTH NATION HW WILEY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, COMMUNICATION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1977, COMMUNICATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Academic Scientists and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Cooperative Research in Twentieth Century America
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1973, COMMUNICATION
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1938, COMMUNICATION
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1953, COMMUNICATION