Adequate Fertilization, Application Method and Sowing Techniques Improve Maize Yield and Related Traits

被引:13
作者
Imran [1 ,2 ]
Amanullah [1 ]
Khan, Asad Ali [3 ]
Mahmood, Tariq [3 ]
Al Tawaha, Abdel Rahman [4 ]
Khanum, Samia [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr, Dept Agron, Peshawar, Pakistan
[2] Agr Extens Dept, Merged Dist, Khyber Pakhunkh, Pakistan
[3] Hazara Univ Mansehra, Dept Agr Bioinformat, Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunk, Pakistan
[4] Al Hussein Bin Talal Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Maan, Jordan
[5] Univ Punjab, Dept Bot, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Maize (Zea mays L; sowing methods; N sources; application methods; yield; ZEA-MAYS L; ROOT CORTICAL AERENCHYMA; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; BRANCHING DENSITY; WATER; NITROGEN; SOILS; GRAIN; CELL; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1080/00103624.2021.1925688
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Determining optimum plant populations with improved planting methods and adequate fertilization with soil modification possesses a gigantic potential to enhance maize productivity. Experiments were performed on a farmer's field in the framework of Farmers' Field School during the Kharif season of 2014. The experiment design was RCB, with split plot arrangements having three replications. Three sowing techniques [drill sowing (DS), dibbling sowing (DBS), and ridge sowing (RS)], three organic nitrogen (N) sources and two application methods were studied during the experiment. Sowing techniques were allocated to the main plots, while nitrogen sources, cattle manure (CM), urea and Chicken manure (ChM) and its methods of application (before and after tilling) along with control were allocated to the sub-plots. The results showed that the sowing methods and the treatment of nitrogen had significant effects on maize productivity. Comparing the different sowing methods, RS has a higher biological yield (12%), grain yield (38%) than DBS. A higher number of grain ear(-1) (32%), 1000 grain weight (11%), grain yield (52%), biological yield (28%), and harvest index (18%) were observed with plots treated with ChM than control plots. Similarly, higher grain ear(-1) (6%), 1000 grain weight (7%), grain yield (32%), biological yield (17%), and harvest index (10%) were observed with N application before tilling than after tilling application method. With before tilling of ChM, maize yield was higher than the CM and Urea. In conclusion, ChM and CM embedded in soil with RS can sustainably increase maize yield and soil productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:2318 / 2330
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Akpalu M. M., 2014, American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, V4, P674
  • [2] Al-Tawaha A. R. M., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V492, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012085
  • [3] Humic Acid and Nitrogen Levels Optimizing Productivity of Green Gram (Vigna radiate L.)
    Asad Ali Izhar Ali
    Aman Khan
    Muhammad Imran
    Ihtisham Inamullah
    Bakhshah Khan
    Ismail Asim
    Abdul Ali
    Gul Zib
    Naveed Khan
    Baber Rab
    [J]. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 45 (1) : 43 - 47
  • [4] DroughtDB: an expert-curated compilation of plant drought stress genes and their homologs in nine species
    Alter, Svenja
    Bader, Kai C.
    Spannagl, Manuel
    Wang, Yu
    Bauer, Eva
    Schoen, Chris-Carolin
    Mayer, Klaus F. X.
    [J]. DATABASE-THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DATABASES AND CURATION, 2015,
  • [5] Inducing drought tolerance in plants: Recent advances
    Ashraf, M.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2010, 28 (01) : 169 - 183
  • [6] Azarmi R, 2008, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V7, P2397
  • [7] Aziz A., 2016, American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, V10, P1, DOI [10.9734/AJEA/2016/20072, DOI 10.9734/AJEA/2016/20072]
  • [8] Bardan, 2003, EGYPT J AGRIC RES, V81, P433, DOI DOI 10.1104/PP.114.251759
  • [9] Begum MA., 2015, Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, V2, P35, DOI DOI 10.3329/RALF.V2I1.23027
  • [10] Dynamics of aerenchyma distribution in the cortex of sulfate-deprived adventitious roots of maize
    Bouranis, DL
    Chorianopoulou, SN
    Kollias, C
    Maniou, P
    Protonotarios, VE
    Siyiannis, VF
    Hawkesford, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2006, 97 (05) : 695 - 704