The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 and the interviewing of vulnerable groups: A practitioner's perspective

被引:6
作者
Nield, R
Milne, R
Bull, R
Marlow, K
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, ICJS, Portsmouth PO1 2QQ, Hants, England
[2] Surrey Police, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Psychol, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1348/135532503322362997
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose. To discover practitioners' appreciation of the legislative changes that the Youth justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, largely implemented in 2002, will have on investigative interviewing of vulnerable groups. Method. Police officers and social workers completed a questionnaire that asked about their perceptions of the Youth justice and Criminal justice Act 1999. Results. Practitioners thought that a large number of interviewees would be eligible for the special measures allowed within the remit of the new act. It was believed that the act would result in achieving best evidence with respect to accuracy and recording of interviews and in less discrimination against vulnerable groups. However, it was believed that implementing the act would be demanding in terms of time and money. Conclusion. Police officers and social workers share positive and negative views concerning the implementation and efficacy of the new legislation.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 228
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], REPORT INQUIRY REMOV
[2]  
[Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES MEMORAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], SPEAK JUST
[4]  
CHERRYMAN J, 2001, INT J POLICE SCI MAN, V3, P199, DOI DOI 10.1177/146135570100300302
[5]  
Clarke C., 2001, National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course
[6]   A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness victim investigative interviewing [J].
Clifford, BR ;
George, R .
PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 1996, 2 (03) :231-248
[7]  
Davies G.M., 1995, VIDEOTAPING CHILDREN
[8]  
GUDJONSSON GH, 1993, RES STUDY 12
[9]  
Home Office and Department of Health, 2002, ACH BEST EV GUID VUL
[10]  
Home Office and Department of Health, 1992, MEM GOOD PRACT VID R