Determining the net environmental performance of hydropower: A new methodological approach by combining life cycle and ecosystem services assessment

被引:33
作者
Briones-Hidrovo, Andrei [1 ]
Uche, Javier [1 ]
Martinez-Gracia, Amaya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, CIRCE Res Inst, Maria de Luna S-N, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
关键词
Methodological approach; Life cycle assessment; Ecosystem services; Hydropower; Sustainability; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; HYDROELECTRIC RESERVOIRS; GHG EMISSIONS; MONETARY VALUATION; EMERGY ANALYSIS; ASSESSMENT LCA; RIVER-BASIN; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136369
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the face of climate-ecological breakdown, it is well known that the world aims at developing renewable energies in order to replace fossil fuels. However, there is a great concern regarding their environmental-ecological issues specially with those ones that have a deep interplay with its immediate environment such the case of hydropower. Despite efforts, the existing environmental-ecological methodologies and approaches are incapable to encompass the wide impacts of hydropower. To bridge this knowledge gap, the goal of this paper is twofold: first, to propose a methodological approach that combines and balances two well-known environmental-ecological assessments: life cycle (LCA) and ecosystem services assessment (ESA). This way, the proposal enables a deeper look into the environmental-ecological performance. Second, to determine the total environmental-ecological accounting and hence the net environmental performance of hydropower. In order to expose the applicability of the proposed methodological approach, case studies of a dam and run-of-river hydropower plant located in Ecuador were examined. Analysis found a net environmental performance (NEP) of -0.98 $/kWh and -0.08 $/kWh, respectively. These results clearly indicate a marked environmental-ecological difference between these two hydropower schemes, awareness of which may be helpful for further decision-making and developing new energy policies in pursuit of sustainable development goals. What is more, this methodological approach may be applied and extended not only to other renewable energy technologies, but also to any other project or activity where the exploitation and use of natural resources are involved. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Carbon dioxide and methane emissions and the carbon budget of a 10-year old tropical reservoir (Petit Saut, French Guiana) -: art. no. GB4007 [J].
Abril, G ;
Guérin, F ;
Richard, S ;
Delmas, R ;
Galy-Lacaux, C ;
Gosse, P ;
Tremblay, A ;
Varfalvy, L ;
Dos Santos, MA ;
Matvienko, B .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2005, 19 (04)
[2]  
AIDA, 2009, INF GRAND REPR AM PE
[3]   Towards an optimal coverage of ecosystem services in LCA [J].
Alejandre, Elizabeth M. ;
van Bodegom, Peter M. ;
Guinee, Jeroen B. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :714-722
[4]   Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), or multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) or both: politicians' perspective in transport policy appraisal [J].
Annema, Jan Anne ;
Mouter, Niek ;
Razaei, Jafar .
18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 :788-797
[5]  
[Anonymous], CHINA ECOL ENG, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.12.037
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ILCD handbook: analysis of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in life cycle assessment
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Hydropower Status Report
[9]   Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Perez-Rincon, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2018, 27 (01) :29-53
[10]   Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldinelli, Giorgio ;
D'Alessandro, Francesco ;
Scrucca, Flavio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1113-1122