Modified Harris Hip Score as patient-reported outcome measure in osteoarthritic patients: psychometric properties of the Greek version

被引:19
|
作者
Stasi, Sophia [1 ]
Papathanasiou, George [1 ]
Diochnou, Afroditi [1 ]
Polikreti, Basiliki [1 ]
Chalimourdas, Antonios [1 ]
Macheras, George A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Fac Hlth & Care Sci, Physiotherapy Dept, Lab Neuromuscular & Cardiovasc Study Mot, Campus 1,28 Agiou Spyridonos St, Egaleo 12243, Attica, Greece
[2] KAT Gen Hosp Attica, Orthopaed Dept 4, Kifisia, Attica, Greece
关键词
Osteoarthritis-hip; patient-reported outcome measures; physical-performance measures; reliability; validity; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; HEALTH; INSTRUMENTS; GUIDELINES; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/1120700020901682
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: This study explored the psychometric properties of the modified Harris Hip Score-Greek version (mHHS-Gr) as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in osteoarthritic hip patients. Methods: Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and reproducibility were evaluated in 90 patients aged >55 years. Construct validity was tested against Greek versions of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Greek) and WOMAC Index (WOMAC-Gr), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and 9-stairs-ascend/descend (9S-A/D) tests. Known-groups validity was examined using TUG score (cut-off 13.5 s) as an estimate variable. Responsiveness was examined before and 4 weeks after direct anterior minimal invasive surgery. Results: Reliability: Internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's a = 0.614, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.881, 95% CI, 0.824-0.920). Reproducibility: Floor and ceiling effects were both 1.1%; measurement error was 3.54 (p < 0.05); minimal important change was lower than minimal detectable change. Validity: mHHS-Gr correlated strongly with both LEFS-Greek and WOMAC-Gr (Pearson's r 0.801 and -0.783, respectively; p < 0.001). The questionnaire's correlations with TUG and 9S-A/D were also significant but moderate (Spearman's rho: -0.547 and -0.575, respectively; p < 0.001). Known-groups validity showed that mHHS-Gr scores were significantly higher in participants with TUG < 13.5 seconds than in those with TUG > 13.5 seconds (p < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the cut-off point of 52.5 yielded sensitivity 81% and specificity 71%. Responsiveness: Standardised response mean and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic were greater than 0.8. Discussion: mHHS-Gr showed significant moderate to excellent reliability, significant moderate to strong validity properties and excellent responsiveness. Overall, mHHS-Gr could be a reliable and valid PRO measure for assessing patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 525
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Comprehensive Aachen Knee Score: Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patellofemoral pathologies
    Krott, Nikolas L.
    Wild, Michael
    Betsch, Marcel
    KNEE, 2021, 32 : 112 - 120
  • [22] Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty
    Harris, Kristina
    Dawson, Jill
    Gibbons, Elizabeth
    Lim, Chris R.
    Beard, David J.
    Fitzpatrick, Raymond
    Price, Andrew J.
    PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2016, 7 : 101 - 108
  • [23] Psychometric evaluation of the Urgency NRS as a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ulcerative colitis
    Marla C. Dubinsky
    Mingyang Shan
    Laure Delbecque
    Trevor Lissoos
    Theresa Hunter
    Gale Harding
    Larissa Stassek
    David Andrae
    James D. Lewis
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [24] Development of a Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Patients With Ureteral Stricture Disease
    Boehm, Devin
    Nolla, Kyle
    Naser-Tavakolian, Aurash
    Rosenfeld, Jonathan
    Ji, Emily
    Griffith, James W.
    Lee, Ziho
    UROLOGY, 2025, 196 : 272 - 278
  • [25] A Systematic Review of the Development and Psychometric Properties of Constipation-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Opportunities for Digital Health
    Lee, V. Vien
    Lau, Ni Yin
    Xi, David J. Y.
    Truong, Anh T. L.
    Blasiak, Agata
    Siah, Kewin T. H.
    Ho, Dean
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2022, 28 (03) : 376 - 389
  • [26] The Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM): Preliminary Psychometric Validation of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
    Hulbert-Williams, Lee
    Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J.
    Martins, Ana
    Storey, Lesley
    Bradley, Jennie
    O'Sullivan, Hatty
    Fern, Lorna A.
    Lawal, Maria
    Windsor, Rachael
    Gerrand, Craig
    Whelan, Jeremy S.
    Bennister, Lindsey
    Wells, Mary
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [27] A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease
    Huang, Hsiaomin
    Grant, John A.
    Miller, Bruce S.
    Mirza, Faisal M.
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (10) : 2572 - 2582
  • [28] Validation of the Italian version of a patient-reported outcome measure for Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
    Diella, Eleonora
    D'Angelo, Maria Grazia
    Stefan, Cristina
    Girardi, Giulia
    Morganti, Roberta
    Martinuzzi, Andrea
    Biffi, Emilia
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [29] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with hyperhidrosis: protocol for a systematic review
    Gabes, Michaela
    Knuettel, Helge
    Apfelbacher, Christian J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [30] Psychometric properties of 3 patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of shoulder disability after neck dissection
    Stuiver, Martijn M.
    ten Tusscher, Marieke R.
    van Opzeeland, Anita
    Brendeke, Wim
    Lindeboom, Robert
    Dijkstra, Pieter U.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 (01): : 102 - 110